<p>Well i looked through the forum to decide what book to use for the BIO SAT II, it seems to be between Princeton and Kaplan.</p>
<p>Has anyone used both? If you have any reccommendations?</p>
<p>ANy opinions are appreciated, thanks.</p>
<p>any1...........?</p>
<p>i used both. kaplan is more detailed, their practice tests suck. Princeton Review has better tests.</p>
<p>ok thanks so would you suggest PR if i was just gonna use one book?</p>
<p>any1 else??</p>
<p>I had PR and my friend had Kaplan. Our teacher got off on tangents a lot, so I was basically self-studying for it. I got a 720, which I think was pretty good. Kaplan looked a bit more detailed but it was so boring I couldn't even read it...</p>
<p>i used PR and got 760</p>
<p>what about barron's?</p>
<p>barron's doesn't really fit the sat ii bio test that well. it's got a lotta info that doesn't really seem to pertain as well as the kaplan or pr does. i'd stick to a combo of cliffsap bio and kaplans. i haven't used the pr book tho.</p>
<p>kirbywamu, did you take bio M or bio E? Do you think it I read cliffsap will that raise my SAT2 bio to 750+ by Jan. 28?</p>
<p>barron's is the best, Kaplan's practice tests are great, and PR is horrible!</p>
<p>@akshay: i took the bio m. if you start now and you've taken most of biology, the cliffsap biology should be doable by jan 28. the only thing i'd say to study up some outside of the cliffsap book is some general animal development (e.g. development of respiration through the different phyla, etc.)</p>
<p>i used kaplans, the book is saturated with so much **** you'll need at least a few months to absorb it all.</p>
<p>dude the kaplan tests are horrible. Such extraneous information. The review is helpful tho.</p>
<p>dont use pr, its not nearly enough info. Barons is the best.</p>