<p>Please read then score this essay on a 1-6 scale. This is shot #1.</p>
<p>Do people need to compare themselves with others in order to appreciate what they have?</p>
<p>To compare oneself to others never truly makes them happy with what they have. Contrarily, it weakens their ambition and transform them into pseudo-satisfied human beings, not striving for greatness anymore.</p>
<p>As demonstrated by George Orwell in his 1984, accepting one's reality and contenting oneself with such a negative comparison can never be fruitful. The fictional London in which the events of the story take place is ruled by a totalitarian government whose objective is controlling the way people think and act for the pure sake of exercising power. Had the main character, Winston Smith, accepted his reality and given himself that illusion of happiness-which is partially true compared to his incarcerated peers having to endure the unimaginable-, his life would have been just as dull, and the plot wouldn't have even existed. It is sad that he, ultimately, had to forsake his principles because of the torture the government had made him go through, but it would have been ever more pathetic and passive of him to just remain still. </p>
<p>Not only is this notion of constant search for improvement present in literature. It is also inferred from the acts and thoughts of many political leaders. For example, Abraham Lincoln, who believed in a peaceful and harmonic society, didn't dwell on how important the American Revolution was, or how good a feeling it was to overthrow the British. Of course, it is enough for some, but not for the ambitious and idealist. For Lincoln, having 13 independent states was not enough, and with the South seceding, he believed it was time for acting. He chose his Second Inaugural Address to present the nation with a heart-melting speech, reminding everyone of the purpose of the revolution and of the violence of war. Although only one month later, he was assassinated and had never had the opportunity to witness the incarnation of what he preached, his words of healing put the nation on the right course. </p>
<p>Personally, I had a friend named Carla who had lost an arm in a terrible car accident. She was amputated for life and became hopeless for a while. The main reason for her sadness was her love for the piano, and these overwhelming feelings had led her to accept who she had become. Only afterwards did she realize she had been wrong, that it's still possible, and that "accepting" the new Carla was actually suffocating the real one, with all her dreams and expectations. Years afterwards, we met. Amazingly, she had managed to become one of the greatest pianists I have ever had the chance to meet. Suppose Carla had taken the passive stance, and had compared herself to those whose case is worse than hers; she would have never become truly happy.</p>
<p>These examples support the fact that, indeed, in order for us to improve - which is the ultimate objective of the human existence -, the only option for us would be not to dwell much on how many persons we know are worse. This of course, is advantageous for own sense of modesty. However, striving for greatness is something we always need to have in mind.</p>
<p>Done in 19 minutes. Feel free to say anything you have in mind. It is my job to choose the good, so feel free to talk trash. It's alright.</p>
<p>Thank you so much.</p>