SAT I Discussion

Test Preparation SAT Preparation
61

<p>I'm pretty sure it was 'IN' instead of 'IF.'</p>

62

<p>goldfish, u had 3 writing sections?? i thought they only do experimental sections for math and cr?</p>

63

<p>There’s this other question which went like this:</p>

<p>The stadium was so unruly Brittney and ME that we wondered if IN GETTING the tickets was worth it. </p>

<p>Should the ME be I?</p>

64

<p>i think that was the experimental section one, cuz i don't remember that one</p>

65

<p>Sixers, yes I had two long W sections and one short one, so I assumed W was experimental.</p>

66

<p>well then you don't have to worry about the stadium question because that wasn't on mine</p>

67

<p>How do you determine what part was experimental? I had two 25-minutes math, two 25-minutes critical reading, and two 25-minutes writing.</p>

68

<p>Ok. Did you have this question?</p>

<p>The painting seemed chaotic, but to the viewer, it was both turbulent BUT delightfully beautiful. </p>

<p>I replaced the but with “yet”, and I’m wondering if it should be ‘and’.</p>

69

<p>you shouldn't have had two 25 minute writing sections...just one and one 10 minute writing section, that means taht one of them was experimental</p>

70

<p>Shina you probably had a experimental writing section too. Usually there’s only one 25-min writing sec.</p>

71

<p>the painting question, hmmm...kind of hazy, but i don't think so..then again i may be wrong
but the answer is "and"
P.S. what's up with the 60 seconds thing, it annoys me</p>

72

<p>Hmm..some crazy rule to prevent spamming I guess.</p>

73

<p>explain the question about the academic's assertion...the one about Plato...A. insight B. distrust C. etc.</p>

74

<p>I don't think I ran across the painting section, but if I had experimental writing section, I should've had that, shouldn't I?</p>

<p>Or maybe my memory is just messed up and I did that question without remembering it (which is likely).</p>

<p>(For the Plato question, I think I put 'snobbishness' -- if that was amongst the answers and I'm thinking of the right question.)</p>

75

<p>for "the academic asserting about plato" question, the two choices I was debating between were "cynicism" and "snobbishness"</p>

76

<p>the academic just showed how plato was an idiot and didn't like literature which suppresses creativity, thus paralleling what critics say about tvs.</p>

77

<p>yes, it was snobbishness, he's an "elitist" from the reading,</p>

78

<p>ok...more questions and answers on the plato and the REPORTER passages</p>

79

<p>well, which ones do you need.</p>

80

<p>one of the answers definitely was NOT "tout...efficacious"</p>