<p>It seems as though studying for the SAT II's are harder. Did anyone find it that way also. I heard that studying for US History is the easiest SAT II if you don't have any previous knowledge. However, I'm having a tough time retaining all the information. Did anyone else have this problem. Does any one have any advice on which SAT II's are the easiest to study for and take. Also, does all the information in the books for the US History actually show up on the test?</p>
<p>both the math tests are easy to study for. if you've had pre-calc, you should take level 2. if not, go for level 1. also, writing shouldn't be that hard. you probably learned most of what you need to know just by sitting in class as far as those tests go. as for the third test, take it in the subject with which you are the most comfortable. if you read a lot of history books, take history. if you're awesome at science, take one of those.</p>
<p>I found the sat I "harder" because of the narrow range of answers I needed in order to raise my score. Again, I did no studying at all for the bio and got a 770, and then had forced myself to study for the writing and math and did badly. When I retook, I raised both my writing 60 points, and took lit instead of math and got a 760...Anyway, its all subjective.</p>
<p>I got a 760 on the US hist without really studying, but I had taken the AP test the previous year so it's not as if I had no prior knowledge. I'd really recommend writing and lit instead, however; they seem to require less specific factual knowledge and more general verbal skills. I got 800s on them with no prep besides having read a lot. I haven't taken either math, but they also seem as though they'd be easier to not-study for.</p>
<p>SAT I is harder b/c you dont know EXACTLY what to study for, like for the reading passages and such.</p>
<p>wow 800 in lit, i heard that was like impossible, any tips on how to do well on that besides read a lot...</p>