@Well then at least I got the Levittown right!
pueblo? hungarian revolution? iroqouis vs sioux?
was the answer to “what did the US not have prior to blah blah” petroleum?
@mdorbust Skipped the US production question, skipped pueblo. Hungarian is remain neutral. Iriqouis is permanent settlements.
pueblo revolt - temporary take over or something like that
hungarian revolution - just looked it up and apparently the us did not intervene (looks like I got that wrong too)
iroquios vs sioux - permanent settlements (Plains Indians were nomadic; Northeastern tribes created actual small governments etc.)
us production - i put petroleum; Since the question was asking was prior to the 1840s it was the only one that didn’t make sense.
alright, so far i’ve missed: levittown, iroquois vs. sioux, and the hungarian revolution…
wait what about anne hutchinson? it was B, right?
moral majority??
Anne Hutchinson was A
Moral Majority - they didn’t like secularism (E I think)
german people settled in the midwest, correct?
hartford convention?
@mdorbust Hartford Convention was to voice opposition to the war with Britain. And yes, the so-called ‘German Triangle’ of American cities with heavy German populations was in the Midwest.
lmao god bless the curve!!!
what wasnt directly caused by war of 1812- annexation right…???
also tonkin—> cambodia??
i put annexation, but for tonkin I put that it gave the US a reason to go to war. pretty sure that that’s right… @yoyo27
@yoyo27 thats from 2010…
what did you guys put for that question regarding the argument for citizenship? The one with the passage arguing how American Indians fought for liberty so should deserve citizenship or something. I thought it was out of African Americans and Chinese in the 1950’s but wasn’t sure…
@blu5959 I believe I said something about Mexicans.
@MrAustere are you sure that that’s correct?