<p>1st out of 811 in ny state</p>
<p>Basis for rankings is irrelevant to school quality though.</p>
<p>Psharp91, we have 70% eligible for free lunch. I'm sure it's more though.</p>
<p>39 / 1287 Texas public schools</p>
<p>328th of 384 Florida public high schools. I always knew my school was horrible. Now I have proof.</p>
<p>University High ranks 17th of 1447 California public high schools.</p>
<p>You mean Irvine University, not LA University or Fresno University.</p>
<p>50 something in Maryland - 4% eligible for free lunch.</p>
<p>5 star school, #1 out of 56 high schools.</p>
<p>I didn't know a whole 6% qualify for free lunches. We're revoltingly rich/arrogant/snobbish for a public school.</p>
<p>306th of 1447 California public high schools.
top ~20%
not bad</p>
<p>145 I think</p>
<p>Wow. I searched by school district.
District: 284th of 288 school districts. (Eep! :/)
High school: 84th of 308 public high schools. (So, not bad for being in one of the WORST districts, right? Right? Magnet power!)</p>
<p>Oh, and 51% on free and reduced lunch. The school report card reports higher and the district number is much higher than that.</p>
<p>Okay, I thought that would be hard to find, but it wasn't. School: 53%, district: 78%.</p>
<p>"We're revoltingly rich/arrogant/snobbish for a public school."</p>
<p>Anyone who lives in a remotely affluent area believes that they're unique in that aspect. Believe me, you're not.</p>
<p>@Collegehelllp: I meant for this area. Everyone with enough cash escapes to the oil ghettos and McMansions down on this side of town, leaving a disproportionate number of wealthy students at my school.</p>
<p>Sad but true.</p>
<p>1/1447 (:
teehee.</p>
<p>1128th of 1287
That's in Texas</p>
<p>I'm quite embarrassed..</p>
<p>mine ranked 52nd of 1447 California public high schools.</p>
<p>that website isnt very accurate.</p>
<p>3 Star High School</p>
<p>557th of 1447 California public high schools.</p>
<p>wooo</p>
<p>at least top 50%</p>
<p>lol</p>