<p>I don't speak much english so this phrase sounds weird to me. If the phrase was, "The conclusion of his argument, while <em>_, is _</em><em>," would the blanks be opposites still? I was thinking that it was something like, "The conclusion of his argument, while interesting, is banal." I feel like the part "far from" should change the meaning to be a synonym, "The conclusion of his argument, while interesting, is far from interesting." That way, the far from makes the part after the second comma the opposite of interesting. Why do they still have to be opposites? "The conclusion of his argument, while interesting, is far from banal." Is that sentence just a fancy way of saying, "His conclusion was interesting and far from banal?" Is that what "while _</em><em>, is far from </em>" means? I'm just confused about the connotation. And is the answer from the book wrong?</p>
<ol>
<li>The conclusion of his argument, while ____ , is far from ____ .</li>
</ol>
<p>A. stimulating - interesting
B. worthwhile - valueless
C. esoteric - obscure
D. germane - relevant
E. abstruse - incomprehensible</p>
<p>Correct Answer: E</p>
<p>Explanation:</p>
<p>Clue: far from indicates the need for an opposite.
So, while the conclusion is abstruse (obscure, difficult to comprehend), it is not totally incomprehensible.
(esoteric = obscure; germane = relevant)</p>