<p>Bishop also had ammunition in her pocket after running out of the house. Why did she have any ammunition at all if she claims she just wanted to know how the gun worked if she ever needed it. She didn’t need ammunition. At first it came across that she did not know the gun was loaded. That would be plausible except now it has been revealed that she had ammunition in her pocket when she fled the house.</p>
<p>[After</a> Slayings, University Tries to Regroup - WSJ.com](<a href=“http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704398804575071840603288512.html?mod=WSJ_latestheadlines]After”>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704398804575071840603288512.html?mod=WSJ_latestheadlines)</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>WSJ *The statute of limitations in the 1986 killing has long expired, but Mr. Keating said his office is trying to determine why a Massachusetts state police report didn’t include details from local police that Ms. Bishop held employees at a local auto body shop at gunpoint after fatally shooting her brother.</p>
<p>“That is clearly the most glaring mistake,” said Mr. Keating. “There appears clearly to be some deficiencies in the sharing of information.” He said there appeared to be ample grounds to arrest and charge Ms. Bishop with assault, possession of a dangerous weapon and unlawful possession of ammunition after the 1986 incident.*</p>
<p>I have read that she apparently aimed the gun at three different people after fleeing her house back in 1986 after fatally shooting her brother. One was someone in a car driving by. Another was at the car dealership (or maybe that was the auto body shop). The third was at an adjoining store or business that I am now forgetting the nature of that establishment.</p>
<p>I have read that she apparently aimed the gun at three different people after fleeing her house back in 1986 after fatally shooting her brother. One was someone in a car driving by. Another was at the car dealership (or maybe that was the auto body shop). The third was at an adjoining store or business that I am now forgetting the nature of that establishment.</p>
<p>UAH Psychology professor’s opinion on Bishop:</p>
<p>[On</a> Amy Bishop - WHNT](<a href=“http://www.whnt.com/news/whnt-psychologist-on-bishop-021710,0,2151302.story]On”>http://www.whnt.com/news/whnt-psychologist-on-bishop-021710,0,2151302.story)</p>
<p>I have read that she apparently aimed the gun at three different people after fleeing her house back in 1986 after fatally shooting her brother. One was someone in a car driving by. Another was at the car dealership (or maybe that was the auto body shop). The third was at an adjoining store or business that I am now forgetting the nature of that establishment.</p>
<p>Genotype-environment interaction in schizophrenia-spectrum disorder
Long-term follow-up study of Finnish adoptees</p>
<p>[Genotype-environment</a> interaction in schizophrenia-spectrum disorder: Long-term follow-up study of Finnish adoptees – Tienari et al. 184 (3): 216 – The British Journal of Psychiatry](<a href=“http://bjp.rcpsych.org/cgi/reprint/184/3/216]Genotype-environment”>http://bjp.rcpsych.org/cgi/reprint/184/3/216)</p>
<p>Aims: To test the hypothesis that genetic factors moderate susceptibility to environmentally mediated risks associated with rearing-family functioning.</p>
<p>Results: In adoptees at high genetic risk of schizophrenia, but not in those at low
genetic risk, adoptive-family ratings were a significant predictor of schizophrenia spectrum disorders in adoptees at long-term follow-up.</p>
<p>Conclusions Adoptees at high genetic risk are significantly more sensitive to adverse v.‘healthy’ rearing patterns in adoptive families than are adoptees at low genetic risk.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>That is extremely insensitive and uncalled for and funny.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>The Police Chief at the time now says he was “not privy” to the details cited above and he now has suspicions he did not have before. Wow. This cover up could only be accomplished if it was coordinated by highly placed public employees. Government employees suppressed the truth regarding this incident and the question is thus begged: Where was the press in all this? And more importantly, where is the press now?</p>
<p>Here’s a video of a similar room where the shooting occurred…</p>
<p>[Video:</a> Officials allow access to Shelby Center and scene of UAH shooting | Breaking News from The Huntsville Times - al.com](<a href=“http://blog.al.com/breaking/2010/02/video_officials_allow_access_t.html]Video:”>Video: Officials allow access to Shelby Center and scene of UAH shooting - al.com)</p>
<p>Everything about this long string of tragedies is depressing, but for some reason it saddens me greatly that no one cared enough about Seth Bishop to investigate his death.</p>
<p>I find it very sad that a young man just beginning his adult life can be obliterated and no one cares enough to find out what happened.</p>
<p>^^^^</p>
<p>Very true…poor Seth didn’t get justice. I wonder how the parents live with that? I wonder if the dad was “in on the big lie” or if he was duped, too?</p>
<p>Midmo, I concur. How could Amy or her parents have lived with that?</p>
<br>
<br>
<p>Okay, I’ve posted the article with the scientific basis from 2004. It took me about 90 minutes to find the article. Perhaps you could provide the scientific research arguing against causality of parenting style on genetically predisposed children.</p>
<p>“Midmo, I concur. How could Amy or her parents have lived with that?”</p>
<p>If they really knew that Amy deliberately killed her brother, they may have felt their choice was to have one child or no child. I’m not saying that I agree with their decision, but I do think they were in a very painful, tragic position that is worse than most parents would experience.</p>
<p>““I have worked around Ph.D.s before and they are pretty much the same,” Jim Anderson said. “Psychologically, they run hot and cold. That’s why we are asking the news media to investigate that whole world that no one knows of. We are referring to an isolated group, like monks, and no one knows what goes on there.””</p>
<p>? He must have been referring mainly to his wife because I’ve worked around lots of people with doctorates and have found no more odd behavior than one finds among people who don’t have doctorates.</p>
<p>^Not to mention that I am baffled by the relationship between monks and PhDs? A world that no one knows of?</p>
<p>There are many of us on CC with PhDs and PhDs-in-progress, and we are happy to share anything. No vow of silence here!</p>
<p>My scuttlebutt of the day: When Amy Bishop was a PhD student, she rotated in the lab where my current lab manager was lab manager at the time. She was not asked to join the lab for her PhD work, as the PI found her odd, but later was heard to tell detailed stories about her time in X’s lab with so-and-so – stories that the other people involved are positive did not happen.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Yep, blabbermouths all. </p>
<p>The statement from Bishop’s husband was so weird that I couldn’t come up with a coherent response. I have this vision of UAH now in which everyone is shuffling around <em>alone</em> in hooded robes, working in the dead of night <em>alone</em>, no coffee house gatherings, secret plots afoot.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I made the mistake of reading some of the comments on one of the blogs referenced upthread, and it seems there are some folks out there who are convinced the NASA labs in Huntsville have some verrrrrry mysterious projects going on in the area…</p>
<p>I read this thread, and so much of it is jaw-dropping and it makes me really angry at this evil woman. And then I watched the video mom2collegekids linked above, and I see those beautiful people who lost their lives, with their beautiful smiles and their lives still full of good and potential, and I am incredibly sad. And I think about the people who were in that room and lived and I wonder how they will ever be at peace, particularly in a small room, with no way out, and tears come to my eyes. This was such a stupid waste of human life.</p>