<p>@WhiteTshirt</p>
<p>I’m actually embarrassed by my personal statement. I just professed my nerdly love of learning and how that relates to philosophy and questioning my assumptions and all that stuff. 5/10 or 6/10 for a personal statement in my humble opinion. Thanks for the compliment, though.</p>
<p>I don’t have any plans for law school at the moment, but I know UCLA would prepare me like no other school for it if I wanted to become a lawyer. UCLA is famous for its philosophy department and for its strong focus on logic. Sadly, I’m not sure what I’ll do with my philosophy degree for now. I’ll probably suffer for a while after I graduate by working some dead-end jobs, but philosophy is what I love most and I wouldn’t want to study anything else. :)</p>
<p>I am TAP certified, so I’ve taken multiple honors courses. To be honest, TAP is the real injustice, not Ws. TAP significantly increases your chances of gaining admission in to UCLa, and I mean <em>significantly.</em> More than 90% get in if they’re TAP certified. The honors courses were all jokes, though. Not in the sense that they were easy, but in the sense that they were not any more difficult than nonhonors courses. They usually required more writing, though. The requirements to be admitted to most TAP programs at CCs varies, but it’s usually a 3.0~3.5 GPA. Take the required number of honors courses, do well in your major, have a 3.3+ GPA, and you’re pretty much guaranteed to get in to UCLA.</p>
<p>To put it in perspective, some people with TAP shouldn’t be getting into UCLA. For example, some people get in to UCLA’s philosophy program with a 3.2 or 3.3 with TAP. Kind of ridiculous, I’d say. UCLA gives a surprising amount of leeway to these CCs to design the TAP programs as they see fit. You’d think there’d be more oversight, but there’s not.</p>
<p>There’s nothing wrong with getting in as a TAP certified applicant in to certain majors if your GPA is slightly lower than usual, say if your major is biology and you have a 3.65 or something, but some people get in with 3.5s and 3.4s into highly impacted majors like that when they probably don’t deserve to. But then again, the admissions officers know better than I do about these things. But this is one thing I disagree with them on. It’s not like these admissions officers know how not-difficult TAP courses actually are, but yeah, they’re no more difficult than normal classes. </p>
<p>I heard of one person getting in with a 3.1 into UCLA. a 3.1 GPA. 3.1. Amazing.</p>
<p>Also, I go to Santa Monica College, which is pretty prestigious among community colleges, and those TAP courses, while fun and educationally fulfilling, weren’t any more challenging than normal courses. You could say TAP is unfair, but then again, it’s open to all. TAP programs don’t like to advertise about their admission stats too much(I had to do some real digging to find out SMC TAP applicants get in 90% of the time or more), but they’re pretty freaking high. Just imagine what the TAP programs are like at some of the weakest CCs.</p>
<p>UC Berkeley TAP is like this, too, but they don’t require any honors courses to be taken. Sorry to ramble like that, but it’s something that’s bothered me for a while now, ever since I got in to the program at the school.</p>