<p>Wow.  Lots of different questions floating around in there.</p>
<p>No, it’s not academic suicide to leave USC for a LAC.  (I’m not certain it’s academic suicide to leave USC for anything, but I was raised with a nasty prejudice against USC, so don’t take that seriously.)  In general, LACs probably do a better job of placing students in graduate (PhD) programs, especially in the humanities, than research universities.  That’s in part because the students get more individualized attention from the faculty and have closer relationships with them (if that’s what the students want), and in part because LAC students tend to be a little more starry-eyed about PhD programs than their research university peers, who tend to have witnessed first hand how miserable graduate students can get.</p>
<p>St. John’s is well-known and well-respected throughout academia (at least in the humanities and not-quite-hard social sciences).  My guess is that very few faculty actually thinks a Great Books curriculum is a good idea – even at the University of Chicago, people tend to bristle when anyone suggests that its Core Curriculum is like St. John’s.  But most would acknowledge that a motivated student can get a perfectly good education in a Great Books program, and be well prepared for graduate school in a non-technical field.  That certainly goes for law school, too, or business school.  (I don’t have any idea whether St. John’s students get accepted at medical schools without additional post-bac science courses.)</p>
<p>I’ll add that from where I sit – East Coast, intellectual snob – I would regard St. John’s and USC as representing different variations on the same academic tier, i.e., a step down from really elite universities and LAC, but still very solid in terms of the students they attract.  I would immediately be interested in a St. John’s student because I would know he or she really cared about a classical education.  A USC student would have to overcome prejudice on my part (although I would be telling myself that, as with Elle Woods, blonde and social doesn’t always mean dumb and shallow).</p>
<p>Philosophy, especially (and literature, and classics, and history) seems especially suited to a Great Books curriculum.  I suspect that if you pulled apart the philosophy-related content of the St. John’s curriculum and compared it to the syllabi of the courses required for a philosophy major at USC, there would be a really substantial overlap.  Your teachers at St. John’s might be less plugged-in to the latest and greatest, but you would almost certainly have a more-solid grounding in the history of philosophy.  If your long-term plan is to go to graduate school in philosophy, I can’t imagine that St. John’s would hurt you.</p>
<p>But.  I also can’t imagine that St. John’s at full freight is a good value compared to USC for free.  Surely there are students at USC who are not swept up in the football/frat/f’ed-up lifestyle. You just need to find a few of them.  I’m sure the faculty appreciates its serious students, and is willing to bend over backwards to help them along.  And for $30,000+ per year, you could learn to tune out the bozos.  I’d even bet that if you worked at it you could come pretty close to replicating the St. John’s curriculum at USC (except that you wouldn’t be in an environment where everyone was doing that).</p>
<p>USC may not be a perfect fit for you, but (notwithstanding my crack above) it’s a major university that offers all the opportunity you need to get the education you want.  It would hardly be academic suicide to leave it for St. John’s, but it shouldn’t be academic (or psychic) suicide to stay, either.</p>