<p>Aside from cases of physical or pschological abuse, I feel that it is appropriate for parents/families to create their own paths. Different people have different goals. IMO it would be a boring world if we all had the same agendas, plans, parenting styles, etc.</p>
<p>I also think it may be hard for parents of an only child to appreciate the very significant differences between individual children within a family, which may impact child-rearing approaches. Believe me, the “tabula rasa” theory took a real beating as I got to know my second child, whose differences from my first make the difference in their sexes seem trivial.</p>
<p>My D has a goal to “explore every continent.” (She has three remaining.) She is very open to trying exotic foods and exploring different cultures. A year in which she has not been abroad makes her feel confined. </p>
<p>My S (the younger one) loves the local life. He so appreciates the small city community of his college that he refused to consider a semester abroad when the opportunity came up. When I told him that four years was a LONG time to spend in *one *place (his college town), he responded, “Mom, I spent 18 years in xxxxxx (our home town)!” He had a point. (H and I are, however, insisting that he do at least a J-term abroad.) He likes plain food and familiar things. He has been dating his first girlfriend for four years. They met in high school math class and band. (Had we had a girl his age living next door I would not have expected him to venture so far as the other side of town, where his GF’s family lives! ;)) Yet I am happy to report that these two chose very different colleges that aligned well with their own goals (he liberal arts/engineering, she veterinary science) so they did not undermine their own plans for the relationship.</p>
<p>Happiness is self-sufficent, and S is a kid who is very happy with what is in front of him. D, on the other hand, wants to see what is on the other side of the fence/ocean/world.</p>
<p>Both did go to some short-term summer special interest camps/programs (D several, S just one for a week during middle school that I recall; he worked locally each of the summers during high school) before college, but I am confident that if S had not, he would still have adjusted well to his college life. I did not feel it was something he “had” to do, because he takes everything in stride. He is simply very easygoing/mellow and does not have anxiety about anything. Frankly, I might argue that he learned more important things from having significant and responsible summer jobs than he would have from participating in most away programs. He could certainly learn how to handle money and travel arrangements locally (going from Philadelphia to NYC on his own on occasion, budgeting for his personal expenses since early high school, etc.) You don’t need to travel from London to Paris on your own in order to figure out how to use a train schedule.</p>
<p>Neither is necessarily better, IMO. Different strokes for different folks. De gustibus non est disputandum. Etc., etc., and so forth … ;)</p>
<p>edited to add:
S had two short-term summer residential experiences during his pre-college life, each lasting just one week. One was a science program several states away, the other a music camp instate. Still don’t think they made a big difference re his college adjustment.</p>