<p>From the many cases I've seen, the few who had low SAT scores were URMs or athletes, or they had something else going for them, like a very challenging or low-income background. Or they had other great achievements that outweighed the score (e.g. a national award).</p>
<p>I have never heard of any accepted student who got a 1400. The lowest I've seen was in the 1600s. Though Berkeley does have students who got in the 500s on a certain section, these people typically have higher scores in the other two sections. (This is why taking the average of each section and adding them up to get the average composite score doesn't necessarily work.)</p>
<p>I really doubt any person would be admitted to engineering with an SAT score that low.</p>
<p>Yes, they do, not 1400's that I've ever heard but 1500's and up. Mine were in the upper 1500's but my ACT was much higher; my GPA made up for it, and I have some other issues that were documented that I talked about in my personal statement. I won't discuss them here, but I can say that I don't think they regretted accepting me, and I certainly haven't regretted accepting the offer. It's amazing here!</p>
<p>
[quote]
assuming he does get his 1250, he WILL (for a fact) get in based on his parent's connections to the university
[/quote]
</p>
<p>I doubt that, as legacies are not given preference. Unless, of course, your friend is a "development case." But that isn't based on the "luck factor," which is what the OP is talking about.</p>