<p>@mickey
it was like find the number that disproves 3n -1 is not a prime number. that would be 12. gahh what was the original pt for the extended 1:2 question?? that may make or break my 800</p>
<p>the original point was 4,6…the answer was 8,12</p>
<p>and 29 is a prime number so it wasnt 10</p>
<p>74.099 75.001 was answer for one of the questions right ?
Also 1/2x something for y intercept
I hope these are right … .</p>
<p>Omitted 3 and 5 wrong, that leaves me at a 40.75 which should be a 780 right?</p>
<p>Looks like I’m at a 42.75… praying for the same curve as 2010 haha</p>
<p>@anysky
what was the exact question for that problem again? with the interval of error</p>
<p>@anysky</p>
<p>its not 74.099/75.001
It is 74.999/75.001</p>
<p>It was something like there’s a shaft 75 units in diameter with a .001 margin of error… What is the range of diameters</p>
<p>do you know if 6 was one of the answers for the 3n-1 question even though the answer is 10?</p>
<p>what answer choice was that?</p>
<p>that’s what i meant
i couldn’t think of the exact number
Though, thanks for you confirmation
How about the y intercept one ?
I believe it was number 3 or something like that</p>
<p>Yeah, I got 3. The one w/ the graph and vert asymptote at x=3?</p>
<p>The whole test was the same test as 2010?
Or just a couple questions?</p>
<p>Is it true that 42/50 is 800??!?!
■■■■ im praying for that curve</p>
<p>It was exactly the same ><;</p>
<p>omg…is there a page anyone posted with answers from 2010 one??</p>
<p>@swedishM8
42 is still an 800?</p>
<p><a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-subject-tests-preparation/925972-june-2010-math-ii-56.html[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-subject-tests-preparation/925972-june-2010-math-ii-56.html</a> post 838.</p>
<p>can someone please tell me what #3 was ?
it was finding either y or x intercept … whatever i don’t remember the exact question,but i know i put 1/2x something…
is it right ?</p>
<p>yea it was A, right?</p>