There's always that one person who makes life difficult for you

<p>queenthethird,</p>

<p>While that might solve the problem, using physical violence yourself is not alpha. </p>

<p>Not in our postmodern, post-industrialized society. Maybe a few hundred years ago. You risk becoming a relic of the past. </p>

<p>Alpha would be using your power and influence to get someone to do it for you, and remain completely unconnected to the crime. Plausible deniability. An example of this is our (The United States) covert political intervention in the 1964 Chilean election. </p>

<p>Or our monopoly on deciding when democracy is just and when it is not. Our international interests supercede any people’s rights to a fair and free election, especially if the predicted winner is against us. </p>

<p>That is real power. Being too big to fail. </p>

<p>In the business arena, convincing the world that you need a bailout and defrauding billions of people and getting away with it, that is Alpha. </p>

<p>Going into a gas station to do an armed robbery or stabbing someone harassing you is not Alpha. Alpha would be opening your own chain of gas stations and petroleum refining rigs and forcing the other gas stations out of business through fraudalent business practices, and destroying the credibility of the guy harassing you. </p>

<p>That is Alpha. Convincing the rest of the world or the law that your use of force, violence, and terrorist tactics are justified and correct. </p>

<p>We value the power of the individual, rightfully so, if this guy in a marching band harassing the OP got into trouble, no one is going to be around to protect him.</p>

<p>Coercing other countries to get loans and projects not in their best interest reducing the quality of life of millions of people so they subscribe to your ideology, that is also Alpha.</p>

<p>If you can’t ignore him then stand up to him and let him know what time it is! You’re not beneath him, you’re not his slave. He has no right to talk to you like that and let him know it!</p>

<p>On a side note, the happiest man in the world can have the most average of lifestyles.</p>

<p>thereisnosecret- I think you may be confusing “Alpha” with a personality disorder! LOL</p>

<p>Which personality disorder? </p>

<p>Is anyone familiar with the dark triad? </p>

<p>Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy? </p>

<p>People who personify the dark triad have been leaders throughout the ages and get lots of women.</p>

<p>http : // <a href=“http://www”>www</a>. newscientist. com/channel / sex / mg19826614 . 100- bad-g uys- really -do-get- the- most-girls . html</p>

<p>NICE guys knew it, now two studies have confirmed it: bad boys get the most girls. The finding may help explain why a nasty suite of antisocial personality traits known as the “dark triad” persists in the human population, despite their potentially grave cultural costs.</p>

<p>The traits are the self-obsession of narcissism; the impulsive, thrill-seeking and callous behaviour of psychopaths; and the deceitful and exploitative nature of Machiavellianism. At their extreme, these traits would be highly detrimental for life in traditional human societies. People with these personalities risk being shunned by others and shut out of relationships, leaving them without a mate, hungry and vulnerable to predators.</p>

<p>But being just slightly evil could have an upside: a prolific sex life, says Peter Jonason at New Mexico State University in Las Cruces. “We have some evidence that the three traits are really the same thing and may represent a successful evolutionary strategy.”</p>

<p>Jonason and his colleagues subjected 200 college students to personality tests designed to rank them for each of the dark triad traits. They also asked about their attitudes to sexual relationships and about their sex lives, including how many partners they’d had and whether they were seeking brief affairs.</p>

<p>The study found that those who scored higher on the dark triad personality traits tended to have more partners and more desire for short-term relationships, Jonason reported at the Human Behavior and Evolution Society meeting in Kyoto, Japan, earlier this month. But the correlation only held in males.</p>

<p>James Bond epitomises this set of traits, Jonason says. “He’s clearly disagreeable, very extroverted and likes trying new things - killing people, new women.” Just as Bond seduces woman after woman, people with dark triad traits may be more successful with a quantity-style or shotgun approach to reproduction, even if they don’t stick around for parenting. “The strategy seems to have worked. We still have these traits,” Jonason says.</p>

<p>This observation seems to hold across cultures. David Schmitt of Bradley University in Peoria, Illinois, presented preliminary results at the same meeting from a survey of more than 35,000 people in 57 countries. He found a similar link between the dark triad and reproductive success in men. “It is universal across cultures for high dark triad scorers to be more active in short-term mating,” Schmitt says. “They are more likely to try and poach other people’s partners for a brief affair.”</p>

<p>Barbara Oakley of Oakland University in Rochester, Michigan, says that the studies “verify something a lot of people have conjectured about”.</p>

<p>Christopher von Rueden of the University of California at Santa Barbara says that the studies are important because they confirm that personality variation has direct fitness consequences.</p>

<p>“They still have to explain why it hasn’t spread to everyone,” says Matthew Keller of the University of Colorado in Boulder. “There must be some cost of the traits.” One possibility, both Keller and Jonason suggest, is that the strategy is most successful when dark triad personalities are rare. Otherwise, others would become more wary and guarded.</p>

<p>I was thinking more Dexter than James bond…but whatever! LOL</p>

<p>thereisnosecret - interesting post :).</p>