Let me offer a tl;dr before my longwinded reply below. UCLA and UCB are still more broad-based safeties for the elites in the country; Harvardās yield, e.g., shouldnāt be affected by the virus. And UCLA now has the highest professor salaries among all publics and it places highly among all the nationās universities.
The following is the longer explanation; read on at the risk of your own time.
I donāt think any of us would want to put you, @whimsicalsquid, through the emotional ringer ā as presumably a surrogate for your daughter which Iām sure you would rather be instead, along with all the other parents and students who have to dread even longer waits.
Thereās seemingly good news at the expense of UCLAās standards as to what you stated. Hereās a link of the destinations of all those who are accepted into all nine baccalaureate-offering UC campuses:
https://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/infocenter/admit-destinations
For UCLAās list, you have to click on the Top-25 Destinations tab, and then click on Los Angeles for campus.
There were 13,720 who were accepted and 5,920 who enrolled at UCLA in 2019, for a yield of 43.2%.
Subsequently, these were the top-10 destinations of UCLA admits:
Berkeley 1,527, 11.1%
USC 431, 3.1%
Stanford 407, 3.0%
Yale 192, 1.4%
Penn 184, 1.3%
Harvard 183, 1.3%
Cornell 154, 1.1%
Duke 151, 1.1%
MIT 148, 1.1%
Brown 147, 1.1%
(Just for fair play for those who chose UCLA from Berkeley admits, there were 1,670 or 11.7% of Berkeleyās 14,277 accepted total, the first time UCLA has outpaced Berkeley among cross-admits. So, in other words, they both grind down each otherās yield.)
The point, too, is that UCLA and Berkeley are both safeties in a broader sense to some of the top universities in the nation, so neither is ever going to have an 80% yield. Harvard isnāt going to stop being Harvard with its ~ 90% yield; I donāt see H losing many students and being stuck with just northeasterners by having its yield eroded because of the virus.
As to what you stated @10sforlife, UCLA now has the highest faculty salaries among public universities, with the average full professor having earned $216,977 in 2018-19. This would place UCLA faculty 9th among all universities, in the middle of the elites. The university can afford the Neil Gargs and Terrence Taos of the world, along with the great E/CS faculty, by whatever revenue is generated to pay these great professors.
Hereās a link to The Chronicle of Higher Educationās Faculty Salary Data:
https://data.chronicle.com/category/sector/1/faculty-salaries/
The OOS and International cohort are helping in bringing in revenue to compensate them, added as you said, to the ever-increasing endowment, which is helping them to live in an area of Los Angeles which very costly. The OOS and International cohort also add a geographic diversity. Would you like attending UCLA with 96% of the students being from California, as back in 2010? I donāt think the University can go back just to effectively educate only Californians.
In 2011 enrollment took off from ~ 4,500 freshmen to ~ 5,600-6,000 and now sometimes over 6k, with the original added cohort having predominantly an International flavor, but now the makeup is more OOS among the freshmen. The Internationals almost catch up to the OOS students by transferring in at greater numbers. But the point is, that the in-state cohort has remained steady from 2010, with ~4,300-4,500 freshmen in the last handful of years, with the CA cohort having wild fluctuations while the University was developing a strategy right after 2010, and with 4,000-4,500 being the typical class before 2010.
So I guess, @whimsicalsquid, there are positives and negatives to the effects of those on the WL. UCLA will continually try to increase its yield, but a lot of that will depend on its employing WLs, but unfortunately this will put more people through the ringer. But Iām guessing, though, that all the WLsters will have great choices, or may have a chance at UCLA after attending a community college, which Iām sure isnāt in your plans. All the best to all those who have to wait some more.