Unfortunate choice by a great school [GT "hotel hosting conference by election deniers"]

Georgia Tech hotel hosting conference by election deniers

Caption

INVESTIGATIONS

By Chris Joyner, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

June 29, 2022

A meeting of activists spreading debunked theories about the 2020 presidential election, vaccine misinformation, and conspiracy theories about supposed global “shadow government” will take place this holiday weekend in an unexpected place — the campus of the Georgia Institute of Technology.

The Nations in Action “Solutions and Strategy Summit” is scheduled to be held in the Georgia Tech Hotel and Conference Center, a midtown hotel run by the Georgia Tech Foundation, the university’s non-profit fundraising arm. Nations in Action, an organization founded by former Georgia lobbyist and Republican activist Maria Zack, bills the conference as an opportunity “to learn strategies and tactics to win America back.”

Even the local paper called you out on this on their front page. GaTech you are better than this.

5 Likes

While it’s repugnant people have a right to their maligned thoughts. And businesses have the right to take revenue or not.

Having the article written isn’t a good look for Ga Tech and perhaps the hotel manager sees a path to hitting a bonus.

It’s repugnant but I wouldn’t personally slight the overall university because of this.

If anything, the hotel manager will be spoken to and will learn the positives (revenue) and negatives (bad press) from the decision.

Sad that people continue to publicly press these debunked theories. What could be the point?

Its a hotel, a public accomodation. I would prefer hotels do not have litmus tests for which groups they like and can rent their rooms. If the group is legal and has a right to assemble ( as this group does, regardless of how offensive their views are), they should be able to rent a hotel owned by the nonprofit arm of a state entity.

15 Likes

Actually it’s at the Ga Tech Conference center run by the Ga Tech Foundation. It’s
not just some hotel.

The paper said this:

5 Likes

Exactly. Future students and parents are entitled to know what actions the schools they may be considering (and their affiliates) are taking.

4 Likes

With all the political tension of late combined with GA lifting the concealed carry permit requirement, and all the GA connections to the political issues in the forefront, GA Tech is not the place to hold this meeting. The safety of students and staff is important.

3 Likes

This is important. I think we all agree we don’t want hotels refusing to rent rooms to people of certain races or sexual orientations.

For the same reason, we don’t want hotels to refuse rooms to people from certain political affiliations. The only exception I can think of is if a group is espousing an illegal activity.

10 Likes

From the article: “Bloom said conferences like Nations in Action are happening in states like Arizona and Michigan where the 2020 election results have been under constant assault by pro-Trump conspiracy buffs. Usually these meetings occur in lower-profile spaces. The fact that this conference is being held at the Georgia Tech Hotel gives it the “imprimatur of being legit,” she said.

“It will confuse people that it is endorsed by the university and what they are hearing is legitimate and scientific,” she said. “It makes Georgia Tech look like an accessory to spreading misinformation.”

5 Likes

When a CC thread illustrates the divisions of our country.

Debate and discourse is desirable, silencing is not.

5 Likes

Not that it matters, but I do not espouse the views of these conference participants. I am just very concerned about our country’s knee-jerk response to silence the things that they don’t agree with. That is what dictators do.

6 Likes

There’s a difference between renting hotel rooms to individuals, and hosting the event of an organization. I’m sure there are organizations that this GT conference center would turn down on principle. And if that’s the case, why isn’t this organization in that category?

8 Likes

Last response to you @DadSays : please read the linked/posted articles in full. This isn’t about “silencing” others, it about the optics and the suggestion that there are better places to hold such a meeting. The impact of the confrontational tone of your posts is in essence to “silence” others- ironic since your claim is that is what you dislike. Carry on. Here is a link to the full article. The front page commentary by the paper is posted above and readable if enlarged. Georgia Tech hotel hosting conference by election deniers

2 Likes

And a link to the AJC opinion if the copy posted above is too small :Opinion: Discredited theories a risk for freedom we celebrate this weekend

No university should fear hosting organizations that hold what some feel are controversial positions.

4 Likes

Universities have chosen to cancel controversial speakers for decades. Here’s one for example. Anyone else around here on cc back when we discussed this? https://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/02/education/college-cancels-speech-by-professor-who-disparaged-911-attack.html

And then there was this one that got cancelled after $100k Of damage prior to the speech Berkeley cancels Milo Yiannopoulos talk after violent protests - CNN

1 Like

A public university should be the first to stand up for freedom of speech and assembly. If the college students there do not understand that, it is well past time they studied the Constitution

6 Likes

And this happened when a controversial speaker was allowed to come to campus Ben Shapiro escorted by police from CSULA due to angry protesters - ABC7 Los Angeles

1 Like

They understand the constitution just fine. One U capped its security costs for these type of events at $100k. You are welcome to cover their costs if want them to host such events. UCLA bars speakers who are too controversial with security spending cap | The College Fix

3 Likes

My guess is Ga Tech as an institution wasn’t involved in the decision. You have a GM and Sales Manager at the hotel and they book meetings.

The administration probably only knows now because of the articles, etc.

I agree there is no reason to ban them but if they do it will be from the public pressure.

Do I agree with them ? No. I think they are wasting time as every theory has been debunked.

There is no risk to students from peaceful people meeting. Clueless and uninformed doesn’t make them physically dangerous.

2 Likes