<p>UChicago jumped from 15th in 2006 to 9th in 2007.</p>
<p>I'm surprised it jumped THAT much.</p>
<p>Apparently, their graduation and rentention ranking went UP from 20th, to 22nd. Who knows. Such a negligible increase in one factor could lead to a jump that significant! lol</p>
<p>I bought the magazine... (yes, guilty as charged)...I heard the full premium version is definitely worth the buy because it has information that even the magazine doesn't have that is quite important.</p>
<p>honestly, i wouldnt be surprised if princeton or harvard are paying us news to maintain their rankings. </p>
<p>you know what they say.
harvard kids write, why one day i will rule the world.
yale kids write, why i should rule the world.
princeton kids write, why daddy's money rules the world.
stanford kids write, why i DO rule the world.</p>
<p>I don't think rankings convey all that much (practical considerations taken into account, the top 10 are basically the same) - it's just lending legitimacy to school pride and adding stress to overachieving Asian students and parents.</p>
<p>However, for the sake of the people that really care about rankings and use them as the Bible of applying to college, I'm kind of worried about MIT. I'm not too sure it'll climb this year, but it's just a hunch. I don't think MIT plays the whole "college ranking" game well (not that it's important, but just saying...)</p>
<p>MIT, Caltech, H, P,S all seem so intent on doing the
right thing environment-wise and academics-wise I wonder
if there is an administrator somewhere charged with
"go fix the rankings". It does not seem to be so.</p>
<p>But as night certainly follows day with any ranking that
leads to brand perception (my media class propaganda)
manipulation of the reporting of the variables will occur.</p>