It is always interesting to read these boards and get insight into vastly different school cultures in different areas that would seem on the surface to have similar demographics.
Our high school screens for AP eligibility partly by teacher recommendation and partly by standardized test scores, yet we still see the pattern epiphany has mentioned. Btw, teachers in AP classes often go beyond the AP curriculum, scores on AP exams taken by students at our school are high, and it is not uncommon to see a student who has struggled to keep up with work in the class get a 5 on the exam without breaking a sweat.
Sometimes it is the peer pressure to stay up half the night and communicate with peers via electronic media, especially if there are group assignments. A student with lots of potential can stumble if they need lots of sleep to function, however. I do not think this is always an issue of students being pushed beyond their abilities - some students will manage a heavy course load better if they are taught effective time management skills, beginning with sleep hygiene. But, what to do if a study group does not meet until late at night the day before a lab report or problem set is due, and it will take a student working on their own twice the amount of time to complete the assignment? Or if assignments are not delivered with enough lead time for a student to pace effectively, as seems to be the case with TheGFG’s daughter?
Others will need to learn that “less is more” and limit numbers of honors/AP classes, especially if they are participating in time-consuming EC’s. (Quite a few of these surge ahead in the college years, especially if they dump their EC to concentrate on academics or avoid areas of weakness, or even carry the lesson that “less is more” forward.) Even those who could manage to get good grades on a full schedule might find that they are more creative, less vulnerable to depression, and take more joy in learning if they are not trying to do too much at once.In the long run, especially if a student chooses an occupational area in which creativity matters a lot, this can make a huge difference.
Btw, the colleges that frazzled kids attended (state school honors college, elite private) provided lots of tutoring and students who were used to asking for help from tutors, or studying in groups with peers, or looking to mentors for advice, seemed to have a distinct advantage. One of mine learned this the hard (the very hard) way. Of course, additional issues come into play in college, especially when students with vastly different levels of preparation are dumped into the same curved weeder classes and left to sink or swim, or highly capable students who were used to coasting by with “most rigorous schedule” in high school try to do this at a school where most other students are limiting the numbers of challenging classes they take at once.
At the high school level,at least at our school, whether or not a student would need a tutor (or assistance from an elder sibling or parent or a peer) seemed to me to have lots to do with whether the teacher was teaching effectively, or readily available before or after school. Our district turns the other way when parents complain that they are spending a small fortune on tutoring because a teacher is not doing a very good job.
It is the same few teachers that students and parents complain about, year after year, to no avail. I think that requiring students to disclose their use of tutoring services would advantage those who were getting help from a family member, or who had gotten the better teachers.
My kids completed their college application without any assistance, fwiw, and I did not see their essays until(with a couple exceptions) after the applications were sent out. Perhaps completion of the common app should take place under proctored conditions to level the playing field.