<p>For those who were chanced by this forum before, did you find those chances to be largely consistent with the actual outcome of your UC transfer admission?</p>
<p>I thought they were fairly consistent though there were a handful of surprises this year, most notably biz econ for ucla.</p>
<p>lol i think that most people over rate people's chances
i think the more competitive the major is, the most inconsistent the chances.
just look at the haas chances, the "oh u have a great chance" seems to appear all to often</p>
<p>Part of the problem with chances on transfers is it's not clear if people have ACTUALLY completed all their pre-reqs.</p>
<p>nah i feel that any donkey that logs into the site would be bothered to deal with the pre reqs.
just that people say "i write very good essays" but i guess its "very good" by THEIR definition</p>
<p>back in 2006, my chances were inaccurate. Everyone thought i would not get in b/c of 19w's and my 3.54gpa..........</p>
<p>In terms of BizEcon- i been on these boards since 05 and biz econ always seems to be a "surprise" . Most people with a 4.0, IGETC and preqs done EXPECT to be accepted, but when the 3.5-3.8 gets in over them they are surprised and so you get a lot of "what the hell is up with biz econ questions"</p>
<p>The whole thing with UCLA though, as it clearly states on their website, they like to see certain things like " employment, family situation, overcoming adversity, etc, etc" UCLA wants MORE than just numbers from their transfers and as such their acceptances reflect that. That is exactly why i got in , my situation was out of the ordinary....</p>