<p>what, I was NOT trying to get you to talk about sex. you are the person that brought up sex in the first place...</p>
<p>This is so odd...</p>
<p>there cannot seriously be people bragging about their game and girls they could get on college flippin confidential...it's kinda funny...keep it up :p</p>
<p>further...listening to guys that think they have intense game is fun...not saying i'm better off than anyone else on this thread, but it's just humorous when people think they know how to get a girl/guy attracted to them by focusing on one thing....</p>
<p>constructive input: you're either in or going to be in college...loads of girls looking for countless different traits...just lay back, don't seem like you're trying too hard, socialize, date around, and just have fun...you can't really conform to "what girls want in a guy" you just kinda stumble upon people you click with...you'll have your short terms, long terms, random hookups, etc....like I said...have fun :)</p>
<p>I don't think girls look for anything in a guy, but if they did I'm sure they'd find a liver, some lungs, a heart, kidneys, intestines...</p>
<p>that sounds like premed humor...</p>
<p>nice/kind? Yeah...nice. Just nice works.
looks? I have to be attracted to him, naturally. But I like dorky guys...my bf is jock-ish. I like all kinds. :)
wealth? It doesn't matter.
athletic abilities? He doesn't have to be athletic though he should be talented in some area.
cool-ness? What is cool anyway these days, hmmm?
style? He should dress nice and not wear the same thing 94859048 times in a row.
intelligence? Intelligence is pretty important to me.
dominating? Uh, dominating guys are unattractive. Hello?</p>
<p>ok 311 is getting horny immature. he's taking this thread in the wrong direction....</p>
<p>^^ wow, that was a blind judgment if i've ever seen one. aspariguy, I joked around with hotpiece101 (because, as you can tell by this thread, she's easy to instigate), and that is it... I didn't say one thing about sex, but if that's how it was taken, don't blame me... you'll have to revisit your source, because I think your conclusion is maligned.</p>
<p>Hmm I think its ridiculous to read books about what women want. If you're good looking you will have girls since you're 10, knowing what they want comes from experience and discussion not reading. The fact that you had to read a book which I found out was published in 2004 says quite a lot about your "game" until you were 16-18 :/ and also about it now.</p>
<p>Yo FrddyGV, and coming on here to try and bring somebody down for making a suggestion (that can help those who weren't blessed with good looks) tells me a lot about your "game".</p>
<p>If you want to get laid... the best advice is to focus your energy on things other than getting laid...</p>
<p>Become an overachiever and makes lots of money... marry a golddigger... and life will be good... It happens every damn day to countless nerds... </p>
<p>The girls on this forum are not in the real world yet. When they are 30 and they have the choice between a guy who is at an entry level job in some no name co. or a dr. making 200k+ a year... then ask them who is more attractive... this lack of concentration on wealth is typical at this age... but looks matter less and less as you age... however you cannot look like the Hunchback of Notre Dame... just decent...</p>
<p>And all you females who are going to flame me over this... its a biological fact that within our species women tend to gravitate towards the men with the most resources(wealth)/status because that provides the best opportunities for their future offspring... there is a variation within our species sure... but I would say it is true for the majority of women...</p>
<p>I also think reading a book is kind of lame. I'd rather, as a girl, not be disected by some book and lured in based on what a book tells you to do and not who someone really is.</p>
<p>astrife has a valid point, the psychology of women does reveal that stability is a big factor for a girl choosing a LONG TERM mate. However, the problem I've found with some girls is that they equate the looks of things to = money.... however, I know more than a few guys who make big bucks ($35/hour+), but don't buy nice cars, work out at the gym, or wear the newest fashions...they prefer putting the money into other things... and yet girls don't really take the time to notice or pay attention to these guys.... they're too busy chasing the tattooed muscle builder working at the local Subway restaurant.</p>
<p>Well I'm glad the way women work can be so easily placed into a generalized science of pyschology and biology. I suggest all the men here start working on becoming wealthy and attractive, or else you'll never get married off, now will you?</p>
<p>This is the most pathetic thread ever. Roflcopter.</p>
<p>I'm gonna have to agree with Jesminder. Girls' wants can't be understood like a science. One thing you learn from experience is that what may work with one may not work with the next. So your best bet is just knowing who you are and not being afraid to be rejected.</p>
<p>That is some SERIOUS faulty logic 311. Apparently in your world the interests of the guy can't be manifested when having a conversation with a girl when he is interested in her. Which of course in reality is wrong :/. Guys aren't all about sex. I personally love soccer and could talk about it non stop for hours and hours, I also like slow music because I just ******* like it not because women like it. When I talk to a girl I have never talked about fashion and can get serious relationships when I work at it or even for random hookups just talking about what she likes and also what I like does work. Also, there are people who are naturally funny and it just comes out from within not to try and impress because women CAN notice when you are trying too hard, I personally am not and don't try to be and haven't had problems with that.</p>
<p>Edit: omg he deleted his post. lol</p>
<p>I completely agree with Jesminder and iheartdonuts...</p>
<p>You can't treat the act of seducing women like some sort of scientific experiment. love doesn't follow a formula; girls don't make tallies on certain attributes they find in men. Women will love you for the person you naturally are, 311, and not who you try to be. People can always see through the facade that you attempt to erect.</p>
<p>I think reading a book on how to get laid is the most pathetic thing ever in trying to get anywhere with women. When you read that book, you'll get the idea that women can be coaxed into deciding to "give you a ride" or whatever you want to call it.</p>
<p>Be yourself, and they will know you!!</p>
<p>Ok, however, if you are "interested" in a girl, what is the reason? Do you call timeout in the middle of a soccer game just because some girl walks by with really cool shoes on? Or because she is really funny, or has fun interests?</p>
<p>come on, get with your nature, you know that ultimately you begin the process with girls to check them out for future sexual relations, and if they don't check out then you put less priority into spending time getting to know her. Unless, ofcourse, you are a chump.</p>
<p>i dont know about you, 311griff, but when i first see a woman, i don't immediately "check them out for future sexual relations." to me, that's like being some sort of sexual predator!</p>