<p>Hey everyone! Some of the colleges I am applying to superscore both the SAT and the ACT. I'm wondering which of the scores below is better (and how much better)... or if the scores below are similiar. </p>
<p>33 ACT Superscored: 35E, 34M, 30R, 31S
After two tests:
35E, 31M, 28R, 30S= 31C, and
33E, 34M, 30R, 31S= 32 C</p>
<p>or</p>
<p>2170 SAT Superscored: 770CR, 690M, 710W
After 2 tests:
770CR, 690M, 690W
680CR, 690M, 710W</p>
<p>Thanks and any/all advice or opinions would be appreciated!</p>
<p>a 33 is better
a 2170 is around a ACT score of 32</p>
<p>Yeah… I saw that on a chart provided by collegeboard… but I’m still curious because a lot of people seem to think that schools “prefer” the SAT and give high SAT scores more credit and whatnot… and most schools don’t superscore the ACT, so do the one’s that do (like washu, amherst etc.) regard the ACT more highly than other schools?</p>
<p>I mean, I really only got a 32 in one sitting, and to get my 33 composite I needed to combine with a subscore from my 31 composite ACT… is my ACT really better than the 2170?</p>
<p>33/32 for sure. I say that with zero reservation.</p>
<p>A 32 is ~1420/2130, and a 33 is a ~1460/2190. Yeah, I know old table, but adcoms are old and this is how they still think, IMO; moreover, some ignore the W.) Thus, your SAT score wins over the 32 and statistically ties with the 33. But since few schools superscore the ACT…</p>
<p>why don’t u send in all your SATs (because one fee of 9.50 dollars lets you send all your SAT scores) and your ACT score of 33 and let the admissions people decide?</p>