<p>BlahDeBlah
[quote]
Me, while I was in high school, replying to this statement: <...>
[/quote]
Well, almost everything you are writing there might be true for my DD, too (except the presumed ignorance about majors). More than that, all our kids were taking classes they liked, and I would be dismayed if any of them took the "AP-whoring" route to improve the odds in the admissions process. </p>
<p>Still, when DD was applying to colleges, she did all the research she thought was necessary, she got a free book with college rankings from her school (that was the only help from the school, btw), and she had the data on her prospective colleges. I am sure of it, because she told us that she does not want to apply anywhere else "because our state Uni is in top 5 for my major, and they already accepted me" - I believe that was when I, personally, heard the words "major" and "USNews" for the first time in my life. See, I am that ignorant poor foreigner everybody is so concerned about... or at least I was one then. I improved since then, and even learned the names of all Ivies just before one of my kids got into one of them. :) Wasn't really hard with the internet and all that.</p>
<p>When DD was applying, that was when we had 486 computer with dial-up, and we were deciding which search engine was better, Dogpile or Excite? And I am not even sure that collegeboard had its own website by then... but I am pretty sure there were no sites like CC. So, the problem was not that we didn't know where to look, or did not want to look, it was that the information was not as really accessible as it is now. Was it possible to look further than DD did? Yes. Would it yield better results? It might've, but not necessarily. I can point out two or three things we were ignorant about, but I really do not see how it might be anybody's fault but ours, and how could someone "support" us in that process.</p>
<p>
[quote]
You can't go looking for information when you don't know you were missing any to begin with. Of course it's not hard to find if you go looking for it, but to say that is missing the point.
[/quote]
Are you trying to say that the low- and middle-income families do not even try to look for the information? :confused: Sounds really strange to me... </p>
<p>Yes, I do find the admission process cumbersome, unnecessary muddled and unfair; but I still do not see any difference (at this moment on the IT timeline, anyway) for the wealthy families and low-income families, besides the college visits and private consultants. If the kids know what they want, they may find all the information no matter what's their income. If they do not know what they want... well, is it the fault of wealthy? If their parents do not want to be involved, what is the big difference with the wealthy parents that do not want to be involved? Hey, I do not blame anybody that they do not come to my door and tell me how incredible Maserati is? If I really want to find a car make that fits my needs, it is my job to do the research. I fail to see how it should be different with the colleges.</p>
<p>
[quote]
...pretty smart kids that did pretty well in school, but ended up somewhere that's totally wrong for them...
[/quote]
Well, there are lots of pretty smart kids from upper-middle-class families who ended up in totally wrong places, too. Even a private consultant will not guarantee that you will like your school. </p>
<p>That's beyond the point. I am still struggling to understand, how is it different for wealthy? If a kid does not know what he wants, and/or if he assumes he knows it all about admissions, and/or if the parents are ambivalent, or uneducated, or internet-illiterate... all that I can understand. What I can't understand - why all that traits are supposedly typical for low-middle-income and non-typical for high-income families? Those are not really nice presumptions, I would say. Eh?..</p>