Why have parents gone crazy in the last 10 years?

<p>Ok fair enough GFG. (Sorry, no post number) </p>

<p>"in the child is learned from the parent, as these are the parents who think they are right in not caring about something silly like high school sports or an English paper. "</p>

<p>There’s a world of difference in their importance, though. And while trying one’s best and honoring commitments are important concepts, it’s more important to me that my kid “gives it his all” to English than sports. I just can’t put then on the same plane at all. </p>

<p>"I don’t think it’s unreasonable for my child or me to be unhappy that an apathetic kid like that is running one of the legs of the same relay as my kid. "</p>

<p>I don’t think it’s unreasonable for the kid to be unhappy at the apathetic / blow-off teammate. </p>

<p>Pizza - there may or may not be a world of difference between an English paper and a high school sports game. It’s all in how you look at it. I’m pretty much with you on what’s important, but so long as the kid knows English is important it’s OK by me if they think sport is more important. Academics, sports, art, music are all positive passions and I’m not sure one is necessarily more important to care about than another.</p>

<p>Reasonable sport parent:
Cheers positively and without malice for the home team.
Claps politely for the opposition.
Keeps her negative thoughts to herself during the game, and bites her lip until she is in her car.
After the game, if she can’t find a specific positive comment to make to a player, then she keeps her mouth shut.
If her own kid had a less than terrific game, he already knows it. He doesn’t need a post game critique.
Is a team parent, and makes sure her child is a team player
 Her kid is on time, and ready to participate at games and practices.</p>

<p>Crazy sport parent:
Makes it clear that her player is the best player
 At meetings, at games, at banquets, in casual conversations
 and deserves to be treated differently.
Criticizes other players. Ever. (OK, I’d give a pass if done in your own home, to your spouse.)
Criticizes her own child’s performance in public. (While you may not think so, this is the definition of the humble brag.)
Criticizes the team, the coach, or her own child’s playing time to anyone other than the coach, in a private meeting.
Coaches from the sidelines or from the stands. The coach hates this. The other parents hate this. Her own child hates this. (Yes, you claim to be yelling encouragement, but if your encouragement includes directions, it is on the crazy parent continuum.)
Schedules college visits (specifically to meet with a coach) during the high school sports season, on a day when her child will miss a game. This is never, ever necessary. (The college coach you are meeting with does not want your child to do this. )
Doesn’t really believe her child when he declares that he has no interest in playing “at the next level”, whatever that level might be.</p>

<p>Every parent in the stands knows exactly who the crazy parents are. It doesn’t matter if your child is headed for D1 or never playing that sport after high school, crazy is crazy.</p>

<p>The US is the only country that has varsity sports at the collegiate level and pays students to play sports in the form of athletic scholarships. There are some very narrow exceptions such as Oxford-Cambridge rowing, but the first sentence is broadly true.</p>

<p>College students in other countries who are athletes pursue their sports individually or on club teams that are separate from the school. We can discuss whether the US or non-US model is preferable, but that should probably be its own thread. </p>

<p>Anyway, the US system is what we have here. Competitive sports can help families pay for college and/or help a student gain admittance to a college that academics and other attributes alone would not have allowed him/her to attend.</p>

<p>I am not going to criticize a student or family that takes youth sports seriously in an effort help with finances or to help get into a reach or stretch school.</p>

<p>Cards on the table: Our family has benefited financially from this situation, and both the kid and parents are happy that we took a very competitive approach to youth sports. We may have benefited also from the kid’s admission to a school that otherwise might have been a reach or stretch. Of course, we will never know about that latter point for sure.</p>

<p>So I’ve got no problem with the families who emphasize sports or the English paper (of course they don’t have to be mutually exclusive). To understand a family’s actions I think it is necessary to understand their reasons.</p>

<p>We know kids playing D1 sports, whose parents are, and were, lovely. And kids playing D1, whose parents are, and were, crazy. </p>

<p>What if your DH said to the person waiting at the finish line, “I expected my W to finish in 25 minutes and it’s been 30, I wonder if she’s just slow today or if there is a problem?” Would you feel insulted by that? He’s basically telling someone you are slow. I’d just think that’s casual conversation.</p>

<p>I sit with the people who want to watch the game. As someone said, some parents sit off by themselves because they either want to yell or because they don’t really want to discuss the game. That’s part of the fun for me and my daughter doesn’t want false praise, so we’re good with it. It would be horrible for me to have to sit in the stands clapping politely, only saying ‘good job’ and not getting to consider the entire game, good and bad.</p>

<p>It takes all sorts of people to make the world go around; athletes included, as well as awesome English paper writers. The world would be a bit more boring without both. But no reason it could not be the same person either. </p>

<p>“It would be horrible for me to have to sit in the stands clapping politely, only saying ‘good job’ and not getting to consider the entire game, good and bad.”</p>

<p>I guess I’m so bored by most sports it would be horrible for me to have to pay attention! Lol. I get it. I just don’t get sports! </p>

<p>“What if your DH said to the person waiting at the finish line, “I expected my W to finish in 25 minutes and it’s been 30, I wonder if she’s just slow today or if there is a problem?” Would you feel insulted by that? He’s basically telling someone you are slow. I’d just think that’s casual conversation.”</p>

<p>I get the “I hope she’s ok” (which in my case, for all you know, I was passed out at the side of the road after 1 mile)! As to commenting on my “performance” - I don’t really know why my H would think some bystander at an event would be interested in my performance, but I suppose it would fall under casual meaningless chitchat. </p>

<p>Pizzagirl, I’ve gotta say, you really don’t get sports. When your kid (and you) have invested umpteen zillion hours in the sport, it’s not casual or meaningless at all. You realize, intellectually, that it’s not really “important” in the big picture, but it seems important at the time. The parents in the stands talk about the game (in addition to other chitchat)–and the more intense the level of the sport is, the more they talk about the game. When somebody misses a shot, everybody groans.</p>

<p>I was going to say before that I think there is a continuum between what eastcoastcrazy describes as reasonable and crazy sports parents. I think parents can be pretty intense about the sport without being obnoxious. There are, of course, plenty of truly horrible sports parents, but there are some who are ultra-supportive and involved without seeming crazy. I think the key is following your kid’s lead in terms of interest.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>The analogy you set up was incorrect.</p>

<p>The original comment was about a parent commenting about a performance in a TEAM competition.
And, although not stated, since the athlete is a high performing athlete, it is possible that these team competitions had some meaning (e.g. working to get to a State or Regional Championship).
As a result people in the stands were in it together and likely have known each other from years of being in the stands together, driving to kids to practices, watching their kids grow from year to year, etc.</p>

<p>Your example was about an individual performance in which any comments made by your DH would have likely been to a total stranger who didn’t care about your performance, especially since it was unrelated to anything they cared about (how their participant was doing).</p>

<p>Also, one reason you might say “I can’t believe [my kid] missed that shot!” is that you know everybody is itching to say it, but they’re too polite to say it out loud–so you say it. In turn, you don’t say it about some other person’s kid (although you still groan).</p>

<p>@fluffy2017 Is was about 100 students. But im not just talking about that one room, im talking about college students in general, alot of these kids are soft. Soft suburb kids who grew up in a bubble their entire lives.</p>

<p>Ok, druce, you want to make a point about soft kids, soft parents. We just don’t know how much can be learned from one example. What struck me more was that you said it was at a transfer fair. You don’t know much more than what you saw. </p>

<p>People naturally consider their own way of being as the standard for “normal,” and thus tend to view behavior that deviates significantly in either direction as being extreme, whether it is actually extreme in any other person’s view of reality or not. Obviously, context matters.</p>

<p>That said, I agree with apprenticeprof and whoever else stated that a parent can care an awful lot about the things that concern a child without being overly-invested in the way we all agree is negative. You can care a lot without being loud, pushy, obnoxious or a braggart; without being domineering or controlling over the child and his choices; and without trying to live vicariously through the child for your personal gratification. I resent the implication that the fact that parents like me are well-informed about the sport, our own kid’s level, and the level of our kid’s competitors means we are “crazy” or “scary.” Coaches, especially the high school teachers who happen to coach, aren’t always as knowledgeable or skilled as they should be. Also, they have lots of people to worry about in addition to my kid. So we don’t depend on them for everything or expect much from them, and that is partly the reason for my kids’ success relative to their ability. </p>

<p>For example, this weekend was a holiday weekend for our family, so I was tired and busy. Thus I did not prepare my D for her race with a discussion of possible strategy as I often do. (Yes, the coach should do that, but he doesn’t. D is an excitable freshman and still needs some calming guidance.) On Saturday, it would have helped her if I had thought to warn her that in her race was a relay team with one of the fastest high school times in the country this season. D then would have been more conservative in her start, and probably would have let that girl go rather than try to chase her. That mistake needlessly cost her a few seconds, in theory at least. Sure, one day D can prepare her own self if she has the time and knowledge, but even pros need coaches. And this week she was too busy working on a huge English project to take any time to research the meet. Also, sometimes you can’t find out pertinent information online in advance, so while her mind is on her warm-up and getting to the start-line, I can quickly scope out who’s also coming to the start and give her some last minute input if it’s important. It’s not big deal if I don’t, but mental preparedness can help a good bit to maximize performance. I think it’s unfair to suggest that because I knew what I did about another team that there is something wrong with me. Parents of average athletes or non-athletes might say it’s “scary” or “crazy,” but parents of other top athletes would likely be doing the same as I am. </p>

<p>In my experience, it is rare to find a highly successful young athlete whose parents aren’t pretty invested in the kid’s sport. It’s a chicken and egg situation in which it is unclear which comes first. Are involved and interested parents more likely to produce an elite athlete, or are the parents of a very good athlete more likely to attend events and learn about the sport because it’s a little more fun to participate when your kid is good than when he isn’t? </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Or involved and interested parents may be enthusiastic about the sport because they themselves were good athletes. And because they have good genes in the athletic realm, their kids may inherit those genes and also be good athletes.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Based on my experience
the latter. I used to know a lot about high school football. Not just the game, but the policies and politics of recruiting. I hung out on EgdyTim (an Illinois prep football site) and even followed S’s teammates’ college careers. That was ten years ago. Now I go to D’s high school football games to watch the band (only when D is marching, though)
and I leave at halftime. I fully admit that when it comes to high school activities, I’m interested in my kids’ activities (and, to a much lesser extent, those of my friends’ kids and my kids’ friends). But I would not necessarily find high school football games or variety shows that compelling if my kids weren’t involved. </p>

<p>And it is fun to watch your child become competent and eventually excel at something. I don’t think it really matters if it’s basketball or ballet. I’m amazed and humbled as I watch my kids grow into their own. (As H has been known to lean over and whisper in my ear after watching one of our kids do something that we’re proud of: “Hey, can you believe we made that person!?!”) </p>

<p>No athletic genes here! Ha ha. I’m sure that’s a big part of it. thanks to all!</p>