Oh, please. It’s just as much a stereotype to say that “immigrants are successful” (including “all” or “most” Asian immigrants) as it is to say that all or most of them are Tiger Parents.
It is true, statistically and probably for logical reasons, that some segments of some immigrants groups have been highly successful, often due to the effects of discrimination against them during various time periods and/or sheer determination/needing to make a living in a new land. (Survival) Pretty logical to me. Jews have been referenced here as well. One of the reasons Jews did so well in the early motion picture industry is that they were locked out of certain other professions at the time.
However, the vast majority of my East Asian and South Asian students (none from Syria, Turkey, Siberia, etc.) end up in public universities, just as the majority of Caucasian students do. And why? Because both are public college material, that’s why – sometimes fine public colleges, sometimes less fine publics. The difference between the two groups, however, is that the Asian groups somehow believe that it is “essential” or “necessary” to enroll in the Ivy League, Stanford, or MIT in order to achieve the same success that they, the parents achieved without a similar “name-brand” education. And THAT is not logical. No Caucasian parents I have ever met think that a “name-brand” education will make any significant difference in the eventual success of the child, because they understand that the employee is judged as an individual, not as a “member” of a school. That includes the Russians. The Russians get it, that it’s about the work product after school, the application of the schooling.
I don’t know where my Asian students will end up after college. I can just tell you that despite the great number of them I have seen, they are no more “stand-out,” as a group, and no less stand-out, as a group, than students of any other ethnic or national origins. The same percentage of exceptional students (truly intellectually gifted, truly of special character) exists within my Asian contingent as exists within the general high school population. IOW, small.
Importantly, also, the same range of personalities and preferences (academics, activities) exist within my Asian sample as exists. The difference is that in other populations there is significantly less pressure (less Tiger Parenting) to subdue a personality, to shape preferences, to manipulate a student’s priorities on the basis of parental assumptions.
The topic of this thread is not
Immigrant Success and the imagined, wished-for “jealousy” of non-immigrants about that
The topic of this thread is not
Parental “strictness”
The topic of this thread is
Tiger Parenting
At least, that’s what my computer screen says. Maybe I’d better bring my computer to the Genius Bar.