<p>“. First, you seem to say that your D didn’t do well --by your standards–because she cut classes”</p>
<p>Where did I say that?</p>
<p>"THEN you imply that she really worked HARD and she might want to transfer to an easier school. "</p>
<p>Actually, I DON’T know how hard she worked, only she does. That’s why I say</p>
<p>"I want her to think about how hard she’s working, and where it’s getting her. "</p>
<p>If she ends up thinking “I worked very hard, and I got a D” and then " I’m ok with that", fine. If she thinks, “I didn’t work very hard, but I think if I did, I’d do better”, even better. If she thinks, “I didn’t want to work hard, and I didn’t, and I got a D, and I don’t like it”, I think it’s reasonable to suggest she could do this at a different school with better results, and feel better about it. For less money, so would I. Ok, maybe not at UCD, not in Animal Science. But we live 20 minutes away and know lots of kids and teachers there. Just maybe. Is that crazy?</p>
<p>“You and your H think it would be worth the sacrifice if your D were majoring in science and was at the top of the class, but you resent having to sacrifice if she isn’t.”</p>
<p>Resent is strong but yes, we would feel better about it.</p>
<p>“The REASON she isn’t doesn’t seem to matter to you.”</p>
<p>Absolutely false. Where did you get that? If one reason is not attending class, attending seems like a good experiment. She happened to share she was surprised she got a good grade in one class, as there was an explicit requirement regarding number of classes needed to be attended to get this grade. Believe it or not, I am NOT a critical person, but how simple is that?</p>
<p>“Some how, your D is expected to get great grades at Duke.” </p>
<p>Again, I didn’t know WHAT to expect. Lot’s of folks on CC suggested she would fail.</p>
<p>You write that you are “grappling” with the issue of whether it’s better to be bottom of the class at a top college or top of the class at a less selective one. Isn’t it a little late to be worrying about that now? I’ve never bought the idea that a kid’s stats predicted his place in the graduation class, but you seem to do so, so this is something that should have been considered before she applied to Duke…not now.</p>
<p>Actually I DID consider it, and read about it here on CC. Perhaps your opinion was included. Now I am sharing how it turned at for us.</p>
<p>“If she doesn’t then it’s not “worth it” to you.”</p>
<p>Trying to figure that out. Thanks for your input.</p>
<p>“At the same time…you tell us that you and your H are unwilling to discuss the change in finances with your D.”</p>
<p>I said H didn’t want to share specifics, i.e. this is the dollar mount we have today.'</p>
<p>. And you also say that she worked this summer. Didn’t she earn anything towards that $3,500? </p>
<p>Yes. About $750.00.</p>
<p>Why did the # change? Because of your financial circumstances? If so, then tell her that.</p>
<p>Good idea. Thought I alluded to it in the first part of the letter. How much would YOU say</p>
<p>"And why are you saying you’ll make her borrow more but pay the interest if she gets a certain gpa? If you can afford to pay the interest now, there’s no reason to make her borrow the extra money.</p>
<p>Ok, thanks. Where are you in the " skin in the some" debate?</p>
<p>This is really the question.</p>
<p>Does anyone think a 19 year old can benefit from the idea of trading working on study skills now, for a smaller loan payment in four years?</p>
<p>“And that while your wants to tell your D that she can only go to Duke if she majors in a science, he’s agreed not to tell her that?”</p>
<p>And he agreed not to make her attendance contingent on that.</p>