<p>@novelidea I took it at Sacred Heart. I thought the math was harder than usual as it had quite a few full blown trigonometry questions. Just knowing SOHCAHTOA wasn’t enough. Reading was a little harder overall, but the one split passage one was quite ridiculous. For English I did put “all of whom” as an answer. I can’t remember what exactly it was about. I feel like I did worse on English because I forgot to review who and whom and it had 4 or 5 questions about it. If I had known when to use who and whom it would’ve been easy for me. Science though…good lord it blew me away. There better be a generous curve on the science. Is it true that 73B was the experimental format test? Or did all different forms use similar formatting?</p>
<p>@diceman…yes, it was experimental…the rest of the country (except for a few states like Ohio) got 73A. Apparently it was a last minute change…we were supposed to get 73A but some boxes containing the tests were opened at some school so they had to send new tests to all the schools in our area…about the trig, i remember the law of cosines question where they gave us the formula but I dont really remember the others. I do remember that 'WHO" was correct another time…</p>
<p>Google doc: <a href=“https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...it?usp=sharing[/url]”>https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...it?usp=sharing</a></p>
<p>thoughts on a -3/-4 on reading?</p>
<p>@jman: Most likely a 33, could be a 34 but it’s unlikely.</p>
<p>so you’re saying -4 will be a 33? maybe a 34? or you’re saying -3 would be a 33/34</p>
<p>You asked what a -3/-4 would be. I am saying that -3/-4 will probably be a 33/34. If you get 3 wrong, probably a 34 (maybe a 33). If you get 4 wrong, probably a 33. However if the curve is generous or harsh then my predictions will be off.</p>
<p>We can only guess at this point…</p>
<p>were there any “who” vs “whom” questions you can remember?</p>
<p>nope. what about on science. was there a 1.1 x 10^-5?</p>
<p>Yeah, I got that as an answer</p>
<p>Yeah, it’s 1.1 x 10^-5 since it was measured that way on the graph.</p>
<p>Have we come to a consensus on the “quipped in retrospect ironically” question?</p>
<p>I put: quipped, in retrospect, ironically</p>
<p>That’s probably wrong, though.</p>
<p>Debater1996, yeah, I got the same thing with two commas. I believe it is right. It was a very weird sentence.</p>
<p>It should be quipped, in retrospect ironically, " due to the quote that follows. There must be a comma before the quotation no matter what.</p>
<p>Was there an option with a comma after ironically? I don’t remember there being so.</p>
<p>After looking through this, I can’t help but get the feeling that English is going to have a semi-generous curve. I’m thinking -1 might be a 36, -2 a 35, etc.</p>
<p>What date do the scores come out?</p>
<p>According to my English teacher, if there was a quote after ironically, it should be
“he quipped, in retrospect ironically,” if there wasn’t a quote than it would be “he quipped, i retrospect, ironically”</p>
<p>@novelidea my friend took it out in shelbyville. Do you know if the Shelbyville county high schools got our test, or the 73A version? Because he said it was easy, and I was like “What…” lol.</p>