<p>We should have cloned Ronald Regean when we had the chance! >.<</p>
<p>0.o</p>
<p>true.........</p>
<p>Well i'm named after him; does that come close? ;)</p>
<p>Officially supporting the good Doctor for 08.</p>
<p>
[quote]
We should have cloned Ronald Regean when we had the chance!
[/quote]
i sincerely hope you're joking...</p>
<p>Cloning Reagan? The Republican Party’s Ronald Reagan? The Republican Party that is united against cloning? The Republican Party that universally rejected a call from his widow Nancy Davis Reagan to allow embryonic stem cell research for a possible Alzheimer’s cure? The Flat Earth Party? </p>
<p>If you want to honor the memory of a man, try spelling his name correctly.</p>
<p>As ORielly says... you are a pinhead ^^^...</p>
<p>Take a joke bro get some fresh air.</p>
<p>Yeah, because Reagan was such a great president!</p>
<p>/sarcasm</p>
<p>Hes better than crappy Obama or Hillary....</p>
<p>^^^all three pretty much suck... go Romney!</p>
<p>Republicans suck. </p>
<p>dam self-interested rich kids, have no concern for other people.....</p>
<p>The last thing we need is another old, fat, balding white guy in the white house.</p>
<p>Regean wasn't that good of a president. He only seems good when compared to the other presidents. In reality, they all suck.</p>
<p>
[quote]
dam self-interested rich kids, have no concern for other people.....
[/quote]
rofl. most ignorant statement ive read on cc.</p>
<p>
[quote]
Republicans suck.</p>
<p>dam self-interested rich kids, have no concern for other people.....</p>
<p>The last thing we need is another old, fat, balding white guy in the white house.
[/quote]
You should be happen to know that in the younger generations democrats are closing the gap in terms of rich supporters. At my school I'd tend to think most of the "rich kids" were democrats. :shrug:</p>
<p>
[Quote]
You should be happen to know that in the younger generations democrats are closing the gap in terms of rich supporters. At my school I'd
tend to think most of the "rich kids" were democrats. :shrug:
Mr Payne is offline
[/Quote]
</p>
<p>I really think you are wrong there. The only reason it might appear that way is because Jews who are usually wealthy, are also in general politically active and in the majority of cases are liberal (despite also being the leading neo-conservatives). I do not think there are many rich democrats who do not fit this profile. I am not anti-semitic at all by the way and believe jews to in general be a smarter, better people than us. I am absolutely in love with Jews and it would be ridiculous to accuse someone who appreciates them as much as I do as being anti-semitic.</p>
<p>Minority groups in general support the democrats. As more and more people from diverse backgrounds become rich, this might increase the number of liberal supporters on campus. </p>
<p>When the other poster said "rich kids" he clearly did not just mean kids who come from a family that has a a lot of money, but really meant "rich white kids" (being catholic is no longer significant although I do believe back in the day Irish catholics were big time democrats but I could be wrong.). </p>
<p>Rich white kids, wasps and catholics, are overwhelmingly conservative. In fact, I am pretty certain if anything, kids today are more conservative than there parents were. A generation ago college was considered a time to experiment with different ideas and challenge the belief system that you were raised with. Nowadays, kids are so dependent upon their parents, that they accept everything without question, and never develop any sort of independence that would leave them capable of even considering going against the political beliefs of their parents. They are more apathetic and self-absorbed. They view college as a big party and are unwilling to jeopardize their relationship with their parents lest they lose their precious beer and rent money. </p>
<p>And the original guy is also right about the callousness of these kids. They do display a remarkable lack of concern for others welfare. If you ask college republicans for example why the don't support universal healthcare, they will inevitably start talking about higher taxes or some BS about choice. Talk about mixed up priorities. I think they might view their parent's money as their own (and it sort of is especially if they stand to inherit it), and thus make its' protection their foremost concern. </p>
<p>I dont know what I just wrote. But I am tired. It is 4:30 here. at maximum I can get 5 and 1/2 hours of sleep. Damn.</p>
<p>Ronald Reagan was not a rich kid.</p>
<p>In the end, the joke's on us, & the people never seem to get the last laugh.</p>
<p>
[quote]
Republicans suck. </p>
<p>dam self-interested rich kids, have no concern for other people.....</p>
<p>The last thing we need is another old, fat, balding white guy in the white house.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>There is nothing wrong with being self-interested. All mutual, voluntary transactions that occur in free markets are results of parties satisfying their self-interests. If I pay $15 for a gripper because I am willing to do so and the seller accepts, then each of us has satisfied our self-interest.</p>
<p>Welfare is maximized under perfectly competitive markets, where each buyer and seller has perfect information and acts on his self-interest.</p>
<p>Indeed, government intervention designed to increase concern for other people often reduces welfare by creating deadweight losses.</p>
<p>Its ironic that the priests for diversity are so biased against old, fat, balding white guy[s].</p>
<p>RR is soooo OVER-rated by the Republicans.</p>
<p>Along the same lines - JFK is sooo OVER-rated by the Dems.</p>
<p>They both were more "image over substance".</p>