<p>I have the AMSCO book but there's just SO much information.....it's hard to remember it all. Would REA be better?</p>
<p>To me AMSCO is way better and i think REA has to much side note information than AMSCO</p>
<p>Personally I think Amsco is way too big to study from, its too detailed... REA is big also but its not as bad as amsco. Plus Amsco doesn't have good practice questions (there are like only 10 for each chapter or something...)</p>
<p>Amsco all the way. It has ALL the info you might come across.</p>
<p>They don't have good practice tests.</p>
<p>Amsco is way better than REA.</p>
<p>You have plenty of time for AMSCO. Keep reading and good luck.</p>
<p>Get both. Use AMSCO as the primary book, and read it for context and do all of its questions, and then do all the practice exams in REA.-->I'm only suggesting this if you really want the 5 but aren't confident. Otherwise, you don't have to get the REA (especially if you also do all the DBQs and essays in the AMSCO--which is something that many students skip.)</p>
<p>Yeah, I really want the 5, so I'll go out and check out the REA soon.</p>
<p>Is Rea's ap us history practice tests similar to the real collegeboard's ap us history tests?</p>