<p>MC-slightly more difficult than practice exams i'd taken...raw score approx:40-50
FR-lucked out, the EQU was pretty basic as well as the other two on the calc. portion. theory, lab and rxns section weren't too bad.</p>
<p>reactions was much easier than I expected it to be...</p>
<p>I know I can't discuss yet, but I am glad that only 1% of the test dealt with ligands/complex ions LOL!</p>
<p>just to be clear, the reactions called only for a balanced equation, not a net-ionic?</p>
<p>Well, it did say to leave out anything that doesn't participate in the reaction, and anything that dissociates to a siginificant amount should be written as ions.</p>
<p>ok that clears it up</p>
<p>I don't know what I'm allowed to say, but I think I did GREAT!! lol 4-5ish probably...MUCH easier than my practice tests (which I scored two 3s and two 4s in). Only thing is I hate this year net reactions- I wish it was like last year where you get to choose.</p>
<p>WHAT? The questions they asked were insanely easy...although I needed more room to right out the last answer because being a USNCO guy and all I like to be thorough with my chemical principles lol.</p>
<p>Ugh...if they had used my score for AP (155 - 157/160) instead of the USNCO national exam I'd be in camp....well that's actually a bad standard since AP is easier than USNCO national level lol.</p>
<p>where can i find the 1999 ap chem exam??</p>
<p>i havent been following the whole thread…
but roughly how much of the exam would i need to get right to get a 5?
or the raw score needed?</p>
<p>thanks</p>
<p>for a 5, my teacher and a lot of AP books say that a 101 raw score is the minimum for a 5… but of course, the scoring can change a little bit year after year</p>