app coming back to haunt you later in life?

<p>I was just wondering, are apps destroyed after some time? </p>

<p>Not that I'm gonna be accepted or anything, just that I imagine a lot of Harvard graduates are going to end up in pretty high places and, like Bush and Kerry, they'll be asked to release their SAT scores and such....</p>

<p>so what happens? anyone afraid of being "outed" for something?</p>

<p>p.s. they both had horrible scores....maybe because they both went to YALE. haha......GORE did better than them.....why? because harvard students are born smarter and than yale students, everyone knows THAT! :p</p>

<p>that's just a joke btw....all students are equal, its just some students are more equal than others :)</p>

<p>they both had horrible scores? care to elaborate? i don't think anything in the 1200s, way before the readjustment, is horrible. If anything, its average for the school.</p>

<p>Yup, according to the wasington post, it was 1206. I don't know how they even calculated the 6 points. Hey, but a 1200 is pretty good for Bush! I was expecting a score in the 1000s.</p>

<p>Applications are only destroyed in some colleges. Do you remember if there was a place on the application to waive your right to see your application as part of your academic record? If there was, that means the app stays part of your permanent record. Though I wonder what right they have to publish this information.</p>

<p>1206 - because it was before the recentering, and a 1200 then is about an 1350 now.</p>

<p>Someone go get Byerly. He needs to check out this Yale-bashing on the Harvard board! He didn't believe it exists, ever existed, or ever will exist. Well, it sure exists now.</p>

<p>(I'm not trying to turn this into an argument. I'm peaceful. Just pointing it out.)</p>

<p>screw sat scores..kerry is really smart and an awesome speaker..sats doesnt judge much dear...screw it..</p>

<p>yeah but he's an idiot for f ucking the country. John Edwards was a better candidate. Selfish bastard. Selfish hlillary ciltinatno .</p>

<p>you are an idiot. you'll never be as smart or go as far in life as either of them.</p>

<p>obama or hillary in 2008!</p>

<p>we can only hope...</p>

<p>eleven..hehe yep hillary 08!!!..cant wait to campaign hehe..</p>

<p>erm..i was watchin room raiders today and it *<strong><em>ed me off ...i know its wrong..but they *</em></strong>ed me off..bunch of hardcore bush fans..</p>

<p>Hey! Im a huge republican- an Coulter-reading kid who nearly had a heart attack from joy when the Republicans got control of every part of the government last election. Id be willing to comprimise for McCain 08.</p>

<p>varsity...noooooo.....heh i debated this team at lex..they were hardcore bush fans..it was all over their tubs..and one of their arguments was like oh yeah we think bush rocks and w/e he does is good so stop criticizing him because u know uniliteralism great ..sooo bush will solve..and im like..yeahhh so i brought up iraq and then they were like well that was just one mistake he made..but other than that he rocks...bushs plan to invade and 'liberate' most of the middle eastern countries really scares the crap out of me..:&lt;/p>

<p>elevenbanks you are a retard. you honestlt thik obama or hillary clinton can become president? You are the stupidest person I've ever met then. I'l be laughing when you go to you Asuza Pacific University because you got deferred everywhere. Either that, oryou'll commit suicide because you're just another white preppy who doesn't get laid.</p>

<p>McCain is good for republicans, I like him.</p>

<p>John Edwards would be the best (howard dean would be bet but he's replacing Terry McAulliffe as the new DNC chairman, which effectively gives him power of the entire democrat party).</p>

<p>the south will never vote for a WOMAN OR A BLACK. not in at least another 100 years. to do this is political suicide for the democrats.</p>

<p>Its funny how many of you call Kerry statesmanlike when the very term can be used to argue that he's just as corrupt as Bush. </p>

<p>These rich fellahs dont' represent the middle class and poor, only the rich.</p>

<p>The South will never vote for a Northern Democrat, at least not in another 100 years</p>

<p>Personal attacks are not necessary, guys. </p>

<p>Obama '08. It'd be nice for a Harvardian to run the country, no? </p>

<p>And while we're on the subject of Harvardians, don't forget to cross your fingers on Oscar night for Natalie Portman! Woot!</p>

<p>tell me one thing, one solid thing that Obama has done, and then you won't sound so naive. </p>

<p>Seriously-- he <em>just</em> got elected. He's done absolutely nothing, except give a speech he probably didn't write himself. Obama won't be running anytime soon.</p>

<p>he won't even win. he's BLACK.
hillary won't win. SHE'S WOMAN.</p>

<p>So iamstupid, I can see where your screenname comes from. First you insult someone for their political opinions and tell them about how they won't go to college. Then you use the word woman as an adjective. Yes, good luck dealing with your college rejections.</p>

<p>Well, coming from Illinois, I can tell you that Obama has done a lot for our state, including a bipartisan effort to reform our abominable judicial and police practices that led Gov. Ryan to institute a moratorium on the death penalty. I see no reason why his effectiveness will be lessened. If you'd like to learn more before criticizing his lack of accomplishments, read the Trib's (a generally Republican paper that endorsed Bush, btw) endorsement of him.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/specials/elections/chi-0410240403oct24,1,33315.story?ctrack=3&cset=true%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/specials/elections/chi-0410240403oct24,1,33315.story?ctrack=3&cset=true&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>