<p>The unfortunately reality when it comes to Canadian undergraduate business programs is that there is significant incongruence between what high school applicants are looking for in their undergraduate experience, and what actual business undergraduates value.</p>
<p>Business is a stream unlike the other areas of humanities/social studies and certainly unlike the sciences. Typically, there is a directly linked post-grad goal, for instance politics/philosophy to law school, econ/math to masters/PhD programs, or science degree to med school. In these cases, you stay in academia, so where you go to school for undegrad doesn’t really matter; as long as you do well, you’ll successfully move on to the next step.</p>
<p>For business however, the goal for the vast majority of undergrads, is not to stay in academia, but rather to enter the workforce upon graduation. This is where the incongruence is most prevalent. Back when I was in Gr.12, recruiting and job placements were never criteria on which I evaluated universities, and certainly didn’t have much influence in the decision making. Now that I’m an undergrad though, and having gone through recruiting processes, I can say that finding a full-time job is the absolute #1 goal on the vast majority of people’s minds. </p>
<p>And here’s the difference. Applying to post-grad programs is a pull system: law schools and med schools just sit there and take applications from anywhere. The workforce on the other hand, is a push system: companies hold info sessions on campus and try to reel in kids from the schools they want. The truth is, companies like Morgan Stanley, Boston Consulting Group, Deloitte, or P&G don’t recruit everywhere. They have schools that they want to hire from (same thing goes in US schools too).</p>
<p>It’s for this reason that it’s been reiterated on this thread there is a significant degree of separation between Ivey and Queen’s, and the rest of the business schools. It becomes more apparent when you visit the offices of the global companies - most of the entry level/junior employees have some degree from Ivey or Queen’s, and those who don’t are often a Canadian from an Ivy who wanted to go back to Canada after graduating. Even during the interviewing process, most of the candidates brought down for final rounds are Ivey/Queen’s (though Waterloo’s presence is really exploding).</p>
<p>I have always found it odd that McGill’s presence isn’t bigger though. Not sure what the root issue is there. UBC and the Alberta schools definitely shouldn’t be ignored, but I think their alumni network is a bit weaker.</p>
<p>Edit: Oh but it look like OP got into Wharton so it doesn’t matter haha</p>