<p>I've never seen "QFT" before, but I'm using "QFT" to mean "quite ****in trite" from now on. You heard it here first; this is where a future internet meme was born.</p>
<p>I'd never and never have taken a girl out who i'm just interested in getting in her pants. I leave that one to alcohol.. if I ask a girl out it means i'd be interested in dating her.</p>
<p>A lot of girls can't deal with the fact that they're not special and are mere passing fancies for guys because they have little to offer aside from looks and sexuality. </p>
<p>Stupid girls are only fun for a while. It takes a bit more to keep somebody interested for a long time. That of course isn't true at all but it sure does sound nice.</p>
<p>Most girls aren't good-looking enough to keep a top-notch guy around with just looks and sex. Lesser quality guys have no choice but to stay interested in their boring girlfriends (not even necessarily good-looking), because they'd be SOL if not for the girlfriend. </p>
<p>Out of all girls that take the SATs every year, there's probably more girls that get a perfect score than there are girls who can keep any guy's unfettered interest just with looks and sex (hyperbole alert). As a guy, you'd get tired of banging the same girl every day, just like you would having the same pizza every day.</p>
<p>"Stupid girls are only fun for a while. It takes a bit more to keep somebody interested for a long time. That of course isn't true at all but it sure does sound nice."</p>
<p>Did you... did you... did you just indirectly accuse me of being an optimist?</p>
<p>I actually would quite enjoy Gino's pepperoni pizza every day, but I think the analogy still holds because we can view Gino's pepperoni pizza as the "small percentage of girls hot enough to hold a guys interest by looks alone" and I'd have to agree, cheese pizza gets boring. </p>
<p>And a really good looking girl can keep a "top notch" (if we're talking about looks here) guy around for a while with just looks and sex, but "a while" very probably doesn't equal forever. I'm taking it to mean a few months, which is longer than our attention spans on most other things... And I'm sorry, I never meant to imply that you'd ever be an optimist, just that a nice pair of jugs can keep a guy entertained much longer than would seem logical.</p>
<p>Whenever I say "top-notch" I mean an all-around exceptional fellow--high in intelligence, humor, confidence, and looks, among other things. It's been pretty well-documented in conventional wisdom and science that men respond a lot more to women's looks than vice versa. It follows that top-notch guys have a lot of options sexually, thus have on average shorter attention spans for women. </p>
<p>I personally think that a boring, but great-looking girl can only hold a top-notch guy's devotion for a few weeks. Two months, max. Three weeks to a month, more typical. Beyond that, he'll start straying mentally and perhaps soon physically. It'll take a very rare boring-but-radiant maiden* to hold a top-notch guy's attention for multiple months.</p>