<p>I did not mean it in that context.</p>
<p>I meant it as quantitatively there are many "clones" and it is a well known fact that asians tend to excel in math in science and many do play string instruments so when one of these asians applies he has to be really really strong to get in or have some unique trait. In short, </p>
<p>Asian #1 - 2300 SAT 2250 SAT II's math science EC with orchestra. Valedictorian</p>
<p>Asian #2 - 2100 SAT 2000 SAT II's with art, volunteer, writing EC's and other unique ones. Top 2%.</p>
<p>In my opinion, the second would get in because there are fewer applying with that person's type of credentials (unique), whereas there are many similar of the first.</p>
<p>Same thing with whites, but with minorities there are FEWER with high credentials so each has a greater chance of being unique than in the case of whites and asians.</p>
<p>I am in NO WAY saying hardwork is bad. I know the hell that some of these asians go through because I have several asian friends and EVERY SINGLE ONE plays violin and excels in math science with the exception of one. One of my asian friends has nothing but an empty room with a desk, light, pencils, and books since his parents force him to learn.</p>
<p>As for bad test taking, there is a skill, but it has to do more with familiarity with the environment and ability to endure the test (focus for 4 hrs). How many of you study at a desk with complete silence (the test room environment, sometimes) and do your work in one complete sweep? High test scorers often are intelligent and take the test in the same conditions that they normally work (all my 2200+ friends are like this). I myself change study areas frequently and work in blocks over the course of a day so I have trouble focusing for 4 hours, thus the SAT I testing environment is more foreign and uncomfortable for me. [Hell I normally study with music, my computer screen, while cooking my lunch/dinner, and watching the news. Silence bothers me a lot.]</p>
<p>Example. My SAT is a 2060ish, but my SAT II's are all 750+ and my Math IIC score beat my Math SAT I. It is probably because the SAT II is shorter and requires a little less concentration. I do know that the SAT II is more lenient with the scoring, but this is minor. I learned all I needed for SAT I math in freshman year, but I cannot get an 800 because of the way the test is formatted--I simply cannot concentrate for four hours.</p>