<p>cindy, </p>
<p>I know a lot of people are participating on this thread. But in your post #288 to me…I just want to clarify that I am NOT one of the people who say NOT to apply to reach schools or that they will never happen!! Gee, I hope you did not come away with that idea at all (but it seems you may have?). I am ALL for reaches…realistic reaches that have a remote chance of happening, as your D’s reaches likely are (though I can’t be sure as I have too little to go on). Everyone should have reach schools! I am not into what I call FAR REACHES where a student has zero chance of being admitted (I have had many students with very low stats…example: SATs CR/M combined of 900-1000, class rank in the lower 50%tile, GPA of 3.0 with NO Honors or AP classes even though they are offered, no significant achievements, etc. …who want Yale, UCLA, Penn…etc…those would be FAR REACHES and will NOT happen). But I am into reaches where a student’s profile HAS been accepted to that college. If you have determined that your D’s profile does get admitted to Northwestern, William and Mary, Brown, and Georgetown, she should definitely try to get in as her reach schools! </p>
<p>But I believe every kid should also have match schools and safety schools, no matter how stellar of a student. And if these schools do not thrill your D enough, I feel there is a problem. I feel she doesn’t know them well enough or she is poo pooing them over their not being perfect in each way. Not every school will match up 100% with what she wants. And she hasn’t even visited. She just has to like some things about it enough to apply and then see what options she is handed.</p>
<p>It seems to me that on the one hand, she wants a prestigious selective school that “thrills” her (though frankly, even some of those on her list she hasn’t even visited), and isn’t willing to settle for schools that are beneath her or don’t thrill her but by the same token, she may end up at College of Charleston (likely quite a bit below her stat level) or UMD (local and way bigger than she wants) and that seems silly to me because she is picky on the one hand (has a right to be of course) but then is willing to settle for these two schools that I don’t think thrill her. So, why not add schools in the middle that thrill her a “little”? </p>
<p>I realize you are dealing with a teenager. I realize you see wisdom in what we are suggesting (and you did come to the forum to get more matches and safeties I think as you saw a need there). But I don’t see why you can’t insist that she explore some schools (clearly I suggested many as did others and I don’t believe your D has truly explored EACH of those in depth and is knocking them out off the bat…may not know the schools, whatever), and add two matches and two safeties that she likes SOMEWHAT. That leaves options for spring…it can’t hurt. I’d have her list information she has learned about each school and pros/cons. Without that kind of note taking, I would not be convinced of any reason to knock a school off other than by its “name”. She should be doing that for ALL of her schools, not just any additional ones. When my students present me with a tentative list of schools, they must prepare a spreadsheet with notes in different categories and pros/cons, etc. If they can’t do that, it is hard to discuss the schools with any meaning and the schools are just names. And honestly, if your D is doing GOOD apps, her apps should have statements that are very specific as to why she wants those particular schools. If she cannot articulate that, then she doesn’t know those schools (or additional ones we are suggesting that she has not yet visited or looked into) that well. You gave her reasons for each school on her list and they were extremely vague reasons. I hope the statements she is sending to colleges are more specific. Regardless, she should have to be able to tell you why she doesn’t want a certain school or why she wants other ones before dismissing them. That’s just my opinion. I have seen many fine suggestions of schools on this thread and I can’t imagine your D has looked into them all. </p>
<p>I know your D is a teen. But my D’s were realistic. Your D needs some of that and you may have to be more of an influence in that way if she isn’t on her own. You may have to tell her that it is a big decision to pick a place for four years and she needs to know the schools very well in order for them to be ON the list or have reasons for dismissing them (beyond “I know a kid who goes there that likes it” or “I heard it is cool” or “I think it will be too blond.”). Explain how if a school matches five of her criteria (not sure I know her criteria) but doesn’t match two of her criteria, it is enough to at least apply. She is not committing to attend. Then, at least she may have options in spring and be glad for it, even if she doesn’t get this…YOU do. </p>
<p>As far as the boy who went to Fairfield…there is a HUGE difference in selectivity between Fairfield and Yale. Was he remotely in the ballpark for Yale? If he had been, he should have given it a shot. If he wasn’t, I see no point in applying to schools that are FAR FAR out of reach for a candidate. With a school like Yale, it is hard enough to get in IF you HAVE the stats and profile, given the very low admit rate. If you are not even close, you won’t get in. So, reaches are GREAT. FAR REACHES that are impossible make no sense. I will have to assume that your D’s reaches are reaches within her grasp. If so, I SUPPORT that she applied to them. I never said to reach low. I believe in reaching HIGH. I also believe in well balanced college lists for ALL candidates, even top candidates. I do not know if your D is a “top candidate” or not (you have chosen to not share elements of her profile). My kid had a top profile, No schools were beneath her. She wanted the more selective schools, but she was realistic about the odds (due to low admit rates, not her qualifications) and so she put in at a range of schools. I believe every student needs to do that. Hopefully the counselors whom you are paying, are advising your D of this. Reaching high is GOOD. Being REALISTIC about the odds is also important. Thus build a balanced list accordingly. That’s my view.</p>