<p>I'm not his kid, but we definitely see eye-to-eye on much, but not all. Still, I am honored that you would lump me in with him, no matter how ornery the old man is. ;)</p>
<p>Please understand where I am coming from: I am not defending the new Supe unconditionally, nor am I saying that there are not some serious issues at USNA. All I am saying is to a) let the new Supe do his thing and see where it goes, and b) let's keep the "serious issues" in perspective.</p>
<p>I am just as upset as the next guy at the situation in King Hall. In fact, I am far beyond upset. However, the kind of screeching that has taken place here over a few incidents spaced over 8 days is not, IMO, justified. That said, it has been known for some time that the QUALITY of the food had been on the downswing. That was happening long before Fowler showed up. That it finally seems to be getting addressed is a relief but, in the Words of Ronald Reagan, we should "trust, but verify". If the new FSM does a good job, then great! If not, then more changes will obviously be needed.</p>
<p>To answer your question, I was on the Yard about three weeks ago and ate less than 30 yards from the Brigade while the Plebe Regiment was having lunch in MacDonough. I am not blind to what the conditions are due to the renovation of King Hall.</p>
<p>As for the prior Supes, what difference does it make? I have heard complaints from Alumni ever since I graduated, and they universally were "The place is getting too soft." Now that the new guy is here and cracking the whip, I hear a lot more of them saying, "It's about damned time!" I asked you about the immediately previous ones because you brought them up and I was curious as to what specific issues they had dealt with (or messed up, as the case may be).</p>
<p>As for the cut ECA's I doubt any of them are slitting their wrists or despairing about the future of USNA because the Women's Glee Club can't have a three-day retreat.</p>
<p>As to credibility, I'm afraid my goal is not to build mine with you, but rather to offer the perspective of one Alumni. Nothing more, nothing less. The fact that I have earned credibility with many here and elsewhere, despite disagreements, comforts me in light of your denial of it. </p>
<p>I will say, however, that at least we are all united in wanting what's best for our alma-mater. That, sadly, isn't always the case when large groups of people discuss the issues of the day.</p>