I was wondering if I would need a car while I am in UCLA for four years. I know that the answer to this question probably differs from person to person, but please consider that I am not much inclined to travel great distances… I will most likely stay in the campus for the majority of the year, and I most likely will be outside of U.S. during the summer. Because cars can cost a lot of money and other things (the hassle of obtaining a parking permit within UCLA and expensive car insurance cost), and because I didn’t personally think that I would need cars while I’m in UCLA, I thought of not having a car during my undergraduate years. However, my guardian and some other people say that I should have a car while in UCLA, so I am really confused now about whether I should bring a car to UCLA (fyi, I already own a car and a drivers license in Kansas…but moving the car from KS to CA would cost me 500+ dollars). My question is:
(1) Other than having to visit friends, families, etc. who are living in California, are there other need of traveling with cars while in UCLA? (Please note that it reads “need,” not “want”… for example, traveling to the National Parks in eastern California wouldn’t count as a need, though that would be pretty cool. also, I don’t have any friends or families living in CA.)
(2) About what percentage of UCLA undergraduates actually bring car to UCLA?
(3) Do you think I should bring a car to UCLA? Why or why not?
(4) If “no” to the last question, do you think it’s a good idea to get a bicycle instead? Is UCLA too crowded to ride a bicycle? Do you often see people riding bicycle there or not?
I am asking these questions because I would have to pay about $2,500 this year for car insurance if I am carrying a car to UCLA…Any other comments and/or tips would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you!
P.S. I already know that I need to have a parking permit for UCLA if I want to bring a car there.