<p>Random:</p>
<p>I know people at NYU (not Stern) THAT beat out Stern kids for Goldman Sachs/Morgan Stanley. Thus, if you kill it, it’s totally worth it.</p>
<p>Now I’m going to go into UPenn LPS…</p>
<p>At Columbia GS, you take the same classes as undergraduate students, and ALMOST have the same requirements (I think there’s a one or two course difference). You can take night courses, which are available to traditional undergraduates as well. The amount of night courses is very limited. These night courses give working GS students an easier option to attend class. Your not required to take night classes at all. Your degree is awarded by the School of General Studies at Columbia University.</p>
<p>At UPenn LPS, you have the option of taking night courses (which are open to traditional students), or regular daytime courses. This is because a lot of LPS people work. You are not required to take night classes at all. The amount of night courses is very limited. Your degree requirements are 100% identical to traditional students, the only exception being your able to (if given permission) opt for Pass/Fail in your foreign language courses. Your degree, because LPS is a division within the College of Arts and Sciences, is awarded by The College of Arts and Sciences - not LPS. Thus, at UPenn LPS, there’s less distinction degree wise between traditional and non-traditional students then there is at GS. In fact, there’s none (except you cannot participate in varsity level sports, which I believe at GS you can).</p>
<p>Housing at UPenn LPS, at least on campus, like GS, is segregated.</p>
<p>Another poster claimed you can take all online courses to finish your degree = this is not true. The College of Arts and Sciences offers a handful (between 2-4) online courses per semester that are available to all students (including LPS). These courses are also available during the summer.</p>
<p>At LPS however, if you choose to take night courses, you’re only limited to general ed/core classes. Once you reach upper divisional courses, you must take them during the day - they don’t offer those courses there. If you search through the UPenn forum, you’ll read traditional CAS/Wharton students who’ve taken night courses along side LPS students who’ve chosen to done so - and stated the quality of the class is identical.</p>
<p>At Columbia GS, your not able to use Columbia College networking resources - as has been stated by numerous GSers. At UPenn LPS, because your part of the College of Arts and Sciences, this is not the case. All alumni networks are available to you.</p>
<p>I haven’t verified this at Columbia, but at UPenn there is a “one university policy” which allows students within any undergraduate college to take courses in another. Because LPS students are in CAS, they can take courses in Wharton, and the other undergraduate colleges.</p>
<p>The reason I know so much is once I was admitted into UPenn, I setup phone conversations with my advisor, as well as emailed the chairs of the economics department for undergraduates within CAS and Wharton. Economics as an undergraduate at CAS is nearly identical to Wharton, so the two departments collaborate a lot.</p>
<p>I’m really interested in Columbia simply because:</p>
<p>– It’s not too far from where I’m living now
– Columbia business school is where value investing was born, and I’d love to try and get into their dual BA/MBA program
– Transfer evaluation process is much more flexible</p>
<p>That being said, after all the research I’ve done, I’d actually have to say that as a UPenn LPS student, you’re more of a traditional student than at GS. I think the big distinction people have in their mind is Columbia, outside of academia, has a much more famous name. </p>
<p>I saw a few students rank the non-traditional programs. I’ve done tons of research on this (beyond reading websites, calling people, and being annoying), and I’d rank them in traditionally as:</p>
<p>Yale Eli Whitney Program - exactly identical, no difference, no exceptions, compared with traditional students</p>
<p>UPenn LPS - Degree is identical with no school distinction (no GS, EXTENSION), or degree distinction. You can take night courses up to a point, and can opt to get your foreign language pass/fail. Your an alumni of the College of Arts and Sciences, not GS, or extension, or anything of the sort. As an admitted transfer student within LPS, you’re required to go through the same transfer evaluation process as other students. Here, you log into something called “XCAT” where you post the school, semester, course name, and syllabus (if you don’t have the syllabus, you’re not getting transfer credit). Then, you submit the course to the corresponding department (mathematics courses to math, history to history, ect). These evaluators don’t know if your in CAS, Wharton, or the like - and simply evaluate your course to determine if its “Penn quality.” These evaluators are made up of department chairs and faculty.</p>
<p>Columbia GS - I put GS below UPenn because your degree is given by GS within Columbia, not CC (which is different than Penn because your degree as an LPS student is awarded by Penns equivalent of CC). Your alumni network is segregated, and recruiters can look on your transcript and see your in GS, where as at Penn, your advisor and you are the only ones that know. The transfer evaluation process here seems much more flexible (which I LOVE!). Here, from what I’ve read/been told, your transcript determines which courses you’re hoping will transfer, and your advisor makes the call - not the specific departments the courses correlate with. Thus, there’s more wiggle room if your history course wasn’t as in depth or difficult as a Columbia course.</p>
<p>This being said, I don’t think there’s any distinction in the quality of education at any of these three programs - their all fantastic I’m sure. I’m simply distinguishing between the traditional aspects of these “non-traditional programs” and their non-traditional aspects.</p>