Grade My Essay

<p>FYI: My essay took up all my writing space, so if it seems too short, I probably have a big handwriting. Also, grade on a scale of 1-6, with whole numbers (I would prefer not to have something such as 4.5: it's either 4 or 5. Sorry for sounding demanding.)</p>

<p>Time: 25 minutes</p>

<p>Prompt:
"People who like to think of themeselves as tough-minded and realistic tend to take it for granted that human nature is "selfish" and that life is a struggle in which only the fittest may survive. According to this view, the basic law by which people must live is the law of the jungle. The "fittest" are those people who can bring to the struggle superior force, superior cunning, and superior ruthlessness. --Adapted from S.I. Hayakawa, "Language in Thought and Action"</p>

<p>Do people have to be highly competitive in order to succeed? Plan and write an essay in which you develop your point of view.... Support....blah, blah, blah.....(you know the rest).</p>

<p>Essay:
Whether one is in school or at home, one has always heard of the banal proverbs encouraging one to be rough and tough and to "push" people out of the way if they're ever going to succeed. Everyone has the idea that the mentality of every star, billionaire, millionaire, A-student, etc. is of a voracious monster who barks and figuratively claws people out of their way to reach their goals. Yet, there are others who have done pretty well, but didn't need to act like a hog to get their way. In life, like a jungle filled with hungry lions and predators, one needs to be competitive if they're going to "make it to the top," but then again, plenty of people have made the same impact without that kind of attitude.</p>

<p>When one goes to college, for example, it's imperative for someone to be very competitive. Look at those Ivy League schools. They have some of the best college education they can offer to gifted and bright students. Not to mention, a lot of their surroundings are very hospitable. It's obvious why so many students are appealed by these fantastic universities. But what that means is that many teenagers are going to apply to these Ivy League schools. Of course, they can't accept every living soul out there, so they have to be selective. That's one situation why one should be competitive: if so many people are trying to attain the same thing one is trying to attain for oneself, then one needs to "step it up"; he or she needs to have the competitive spirit in full gear and do the best he or she can do. That means doing really well in school, joining an variety of clubs, etc., even asserting him- or herself to an activity that differentiates himself from the group. If he or she finds being accepted to this Ivy League school as a sign of importance, than he or she should be willing to sacrifice a lot and be competitive because everyone could diminish his or her dreams when everyone else gets accepted and he doesn't. </p>

<p>Competition also must exist in things such as "American Idol". The same situation when one applies to a top-notch school such as Harvard - there are thousands of people with the same dreams and aspirations, but in order to become successful and get that contract for a record deal, one needs to adjust one's mind to be couragious, be unique, and be strong enough to motivate oneself to improve. In other words, one needs to have the fervor to beat other people in the game, or match, if there are so many players and the only interest you have is to win. But if you want to be successful, it doesn't necessarily obbligates you to have this kind of attitude: you can still go to college without trying too hard and become a doctor. In conclusion, if you need to be competitive, then fine.</p>

<p>FYI: My essay took up all my writing space, so if it seems too short, I probably have a big handwriting. Also, grade on a scale of 1-6, with whole numbers (I would prefer not to have something such as 4.5: it's either 4 or 5. Sorry for sounding demanding.)</p>

<p>Time: 25 minutes</p>

<p>Prompt:
"People who like to think of themeselves as tough-minded and realistic tend to take it for granted that human nature is "selfish" and that life is a struggle in which only the fittest may survive. According to this view, the basic law by which people must live is the law of the jungle. The "fittest" are those people who can bring to the struggle superior force, superior cunning, and superior ruthlessness. --Adapted from S.I. Hayakawa, "Language in Thought and Action"</p>

<p>Do people have to be highly competitive in order to succeed? Plan and write an essay in which you develop your point of view.... Support....blah, blah, blah.....(you know the rest).</p>

<p>Essay:
Whether one is in school or at home, one has always heard of the banal proverbs encouraging one to be rough and tough and to "push" people out of the way if they're ever going to succeed. Everyone has the idea that the mentality of every star, billionaire, millionaire, A-student, etc. is of a voracious monster who barks and figuratively claws people out of their way to reach their goals. Yet, there are others who have done pretty well, but didn't need to act like a hog to get their way. In life, like a jungle filled with hungry lions and predators, one needs to be competitive if they're going to "make it to the top," but then again, plenty of people have made the same impact without that kind of attitude.</p>

<p>When one goes to college, for example, it's imperative for someone to be very competitive. Look at those Ivy League schools. They have some of the best college education they can offer to gifted and bright students. Not to mention, a lot of their surroundings are very hospitable. It's obvious why so many students are appealed by these fantastic universities. But what that means is that many teenagers are going to apply to these Ivy League schools. Of course, they can't accept every living soul out there, so they have to be selective. That's one situation why one should be competitive: if so many people are trying to attain the same thing one is trying to attain for oneself, then one needs to "step it up"; he or she needs to have the competitive spirit in full gear and do the best he or she can do. That means doing really well in school, joining an variety of clubs, etc., even asserting him- or herself to an activity that differentiates himself from the group. If he or she finds being accepted to this Ivy League school as a sign of importance, than he or she should be willing to sacrifice a lot and be competitive because everyone could diminish his or her dreams when everyone else gets accepted and he doesn't. </p>

<p>Competition also must exist in things such as "American Idol". The same situation when one applies to a top-notch school such as Harvard - there are thousands of people with the same dreams and aspirations, but in order to become successful and get that contract for a record deal, one needs to adjust one's mind to be couragious, be unique, and be strong enough to motivate oneself to improve. In other words, one needs to have the fervor to beat other people in the game, or match, if there are so many players and the only interest you have is to win. But if you want to be successful, it doesn't necessarily obbligates you to have this kind of attitude: you can still go to college without trying too hard and become a doctor. In conclusion, if you need to be competitive, then fine.</p>

<p>make it more personal. Dont say the word "thing". All in all, it's fine.</p>

<p>Thank you for your advice. Could you rate it from 1-6, 2-12, please?</p>

<p>really too general i think. go in more depth and dont automatically assume readers will know what things like "American Idol" are. remember, we're dealing with some people that are a little older than us :) also, if you use the word "one" make sure not to refer to that "one" as "they" later on in the sentence- i saw that a lot. keep it as "one" or change it to "he or she" to keep it singular. Example of change:</p>

<p>In life, like a jungle filled with hungry lions and predators, one needs to be competitive if they're (he or she is) going to "make it to the top," but then again, plenty of people have made the same impact without that kind of attitude.</p>

<p>also, the essay doesnt seem to be written in written language, but rather in spoken language- try to sound more sophisticated if possible. you have a lot of incorrect commas and punctuation too (this could be from typos, i dunno)</p>

<p>umm, id give it a 3 or 4, not to be mean. i think the sat graders tend to like long essays though and sometimes dont care too much about content, so i wouldnt be surprised if you might get higher because of the length, which you did well on. please dont get offended because of my comments; im seriously only trying to help</p>

<p>i hope it does help.</p>

<p>Thank you. I'll try my best next time. Oh, I can only hope.</p>

<p>dont worry im sure youll do fine</p>

<p>I agree with the 3 or 4 rating. I also have a couple of suggestions.</p>

<p>First, pick a side and stick to it. Your introduction waffled a bit between "you need to be competitive" and "some succeed without being competitive." Just stick with your competitive angle...</p>

<p>Second, as mentioned above, really avoid overusing pronouns and mixing second and third person, singular and plural.</p>

<p>Third, remember that the readers spend only about 2-3 minutes grading each essay. Try to be clear and concise, but <em>do</em> follow the advice above about explaining fully. Don't assume that readers know what you're talking about. Make it clear to them.</p>

<p>Finally, I personally think you'll do better if you write a little <em>less</em> in your body paragraphs and add a short concluding paragraph at the end. (Overall length was fine.) 1 intro paragraph (in which you mention briefly the two examples you're going to use), 2 body paragraphs and 1 concluding paragraph is a pretty good model.</p>

<p>4/6..........</p>

<p>I think those essay graders love two things:</p>

<p>Personal anecdotes
or
Historical/literary reference</p>

<p>If your essay does not fall under those categories, then I think you run the risk of a lower grade. Even a relatively crap essay that talks about the Depression and Oliver Twist is going to get a 6, at least from what I've seen in books. Your essay lacks that concrete value such as an event, a person, a book, etc. It's more like a bunch of general feelings and assumptions.</p>

<p>Probably a 3. Definately need more anecdotal, historical evidence and personal stories.</p>

<p>Thanks you everybody for your advice, but I must admit that one needs historical evidence in order to get a 6... I don't know. I mean, I really don't know much about history and not much goes on in my life. Am I forever doomed? Also, should I even consider taking AP European History next year? I mean, if my writing sucks that much... Yet, I still have a huge interest in that class... I don't know. I'm so confused.</p>

<p>I guess a 1980 won't be that bad. I mean, I don't want to take the SATs over, and over, and over, etc. God, I despise College Board. Why do these kinds of people exist?</p>

<p>I hate your thesis statement, it is so vague and your metaphor is terrible.</p>

<p>STILL practicing for the Writing portion of the new SAT, Kenny G? Tsk tsk! I'll see you in AP Chem. ;)</p>

<p>Oh God.....</p>

<p>to be fair, I didnt read the prompt in which that metaphor was stated. I still wouldnt use it in your thesis though, I know you can think of something better than that. Its fine to put some of the quote in your paper but I would recommend it be in the first paragraph but not in the thesis. These essays are expository and the readers are looking for structure. Your paragraphs should always follow your thesis in a clear, easy to follow manner.</p>

<p>Could teachers who have had experience in grading SAT Writing prompts please critique my essay?</p>

<p>no way is it a 4 or 3, i would say it's at least a 5, my essay was about the same caliber, if not, mine was probably worst, i got 10, twice on SAT II writing, so don't despair</p>

<p>I already did. :)</p>