<p>I do think only external pressures will require the Greeks to be more integrated.</p>
<p>As someone said earlier, the alums from both black and white houses might cause issues if members just tried on their own…but if it became university-mandated or incentivized in some way, then the alums would have to “shut up” and accept it…especially if the incentives involved things like priority locations, cheap leases, etc. </p>
<p>Some have said that alums would pay the extra costs, well, there’s a point where the alums would not…$50k per year…whatever. At some point, the frats who would pay that penalty would quickly see that the others who aren’t paying have funds for more beneficial things. </p>
<p>The AA houses and AA alums would need to feel comfortable that this would not be something that would dismantle or lessen the networking power of the Black Houses …which many of them depend on for networking in their very successful future professional lives. </p>
<p>I think that is what may be misunderstood here. This isn’t like the old 1960s redlining of neighborhoods where whites get the best zip codes and blacks are relegated to the other side of the RR tracks. The AA Greeks are very powerful and these are kids from affluent homes. They do not considers themselves as belonging to second-rate clubs at all…because their clubs are first-rate.</p>
<p>**Jobs and what goes on in the work-world cannot be equated to clubs & private associations…those are not accurate analogies. Our work world and our personal world can be vastly different. ** </p>
<p>Our work world can be very diverse (ethnic groups, religions, income, education level, etc). While our personal world can be largely made up of people of similar incomes, similar ethnic backgrounds, education level, religion, etc. While our private lives certainly aren’t 100% homogeneous, few of us have private lives that perfectly diverse…matching up with population diversity. </p>
<p>My extended family is multi-racial (white, black, Asian, and Hispanic)…but we’re mostly Catholic with a few Jewish and Prot members. All mostly upper-middle class and college educated. My social circle is about the same. Our social gatherings may look like a rainbow, but we’re really not that diverse when you consider all the other types of ethnic groups, economic levels, and religions out there. </p>
<p>Many of us belong to clubs, churches, etc, that are not well integrated with *full *diversity. In Calif, my Catholic church had many Hispanic members, but few AA members. The AA Catholics tended to all go to one parish that favored their hymns, etc. The Vietnamese Catholics all went to St. Jude’s because there was a Vietnamese pastor there. The Polish Catholics all went to Pope John Paul II parish because the pastor was a native Pole.</p>
<p>Here in Alabama, my Catholic church has few Hispanics and more AAs. But…most of the AA Catholics in my area prefer going to St. Joe’s because that parish is about half AA…and their music reflects their culture. We enjoy going to St. Joe’s occasionally because (ok stereotype coming ) their choir is amazing. </p>
<p>With the Greeks, the situation needs to be where people feel free to Rush wherever they want (even if that means an AA will want to Rush AA houses)…but they have to feel free to have the options to Rush where they want and have the same chances as everyone else to get a bid. </p>
<p>However, what’s to be done about the lack of ECONOMIC diversity in all of these Greek groups …not many Pell students are pledging anything.</p>