<p>I find this to be a very interesting thread, suffused with the value that it’s a serious problem if someone doesn’t choose to be sociable and have friends. Is it limiting? Possibly in many fields it would be and certainly it would be limiting to someone who wanted to be married and to have a family. But maybe not in the OP’s intended field and/or life goals. There are fields where one can work independently doing research and contribute a great deal without a lot of socialization being required. There are even jobs where people get by with terrible social skills. There are plenty of brilliant surgeons who lack people skills, for example. Of course, it’s necessary to be able to interview, work with others, etc. but the OP says he can do that and that’s a different set of skills than forming close relationships.</p>
<p>Is a life where someone values books more than people really less of a life? Who gets to judge that? What if a person really doesn’t need close relationships to be happy but does need books? Or art? Or music? The OP says he’s content and happy. Whose problem is it if he is content studying and learning? I honestly don’t believe that the overriding concern the parents have is his study habits and his lack of socialization. I believe that the real problem is revealed in many of his posts, e.g. if they expect to be taken care of in their old age, etc. I imagine there is a problem in the family and perhaps a problem with the poster’s attitude and he is focusing on one aspect of their concerns. But I think that for some people it’s completely possible to be a contributing member to society and content with one’s life without a lot of relationships. I’ve encountered people like that and the biggest problem they run into is the constant pressure from other people to live their lives as others think it should be lived when they are perfectly content doing their thing as they are.</p>