Middlebury has a slew of activities for parents of first years. The “official” reason is “so parents can learn about the college”. The REAL reason is to get the parents out of the dorms and out of the way of the kids.
Helicopter parents have become the bane of the existence of high schools, and now colleges.
However, I think that what we are seeing are parents whose own parents were “hands-off”. These parents were the latch-key kids, the ones whose parents often did not have time to go to their recitals, who came home and made their own dinners, and took care of themselves. This made them (us, I guess) more independent, but also, like many parents, made then decide that they would “be different”.
So they became more involved in their kids’ lives. However, this being the US of A, things are not merely “done”, but are “overdone”. So parents who had bad memories of teachers giving them low grades, and their parents taking the side of the teacher, try to “protect” their kids from that “trauma” by harassing teachers until the teacher agrees to give little Sue or Johnny an A or B+. Parents who have bad memories of their parents ignoring their academic achievements celebrate every grade that is above average (“My kid is an Honors Student at Acme Elementary!”). Parents who resent the fact that their own parents did not sign them up for extracurricular activities, and never paid much attention to whatever activities they ended up doing, sign their own kids up to dozens of activities, engage themselves in the minutiae of their kids activities, fighting to make their kids experiences “special”, and to make sure that their kid is a star (or at least treated as one).
These parents labor to make sure that their kids do not suffer at all.
This attitude is common enough even here. How many CC parents have stated that the most important thing for them is that “my kid will be happy at college”? The focus on “happiness” as the most important contribution of college to a kid’s life, is part and parcel of the “I need to protect my kid from all negative experiences and emotions” philosophy. Perhaps not taking it to the lengths that some parents do, but it still ties into this philosophy of parenting.
It is not infantilizing students as much as not trusting them to be able to deal with any level of emotional challenge.
PS. I think that this attitude was strengthened by a long list of films from the late 1970s to the early 1990s in which parents were too busy to notice or otherwise uninterested in what was going on with their kids or what their kids were doing. Almost every film of the 1980s which centered around teens either had parental neglect or parental cluelessness as a major plot device. So Gen Xers were conditioned to see lack of extensive parental involvement in the lives of their kids as a major reason behind things going wrong in a kid’s life.