<p>it was 43 what ever he was buying
it was 35tan45
It was 4 times</p>
<p>It was when she was born.</p>
<p>this one definetely caused me problems lol.</p>
<p>Because the passage said “sometime around 180o” or something like that.</p>
<p>It said “sometime around” because it was not a definite date.</p>
<p>jmanco49, the math one with about 65 cents:
the answer was the biggest, but i dont remember it or the question</p>
<p>i just instinctively put her birth because it was typical to not know exactly when african american slaves were born.. and it turns out it was right</p>
<p>it was 19 for the circle (12 + 9 - 2 [overlapping of radii] = 19)</p>
<p>i don’t remember the sin35/45 one…and it was 4 times for the 10 by 8 one… the 8 was the height and it asked for how many 80% sizings would make the height fit 3.5 inches.. and do 8 * 0.8 * 0.8 * 0.8 * 0.8 and you get 3.2-ish</p>
<p>it was E 43 for the .65 cents one</p>
<p>What was the answer to the stamp problem? Where the average had to be increased by so much to get 300 more dollars..or something?</p>
<p>Was 690 (Letter E) an answer to a math problem?</p>
<p>It was when she was born.</p>
<p>this one definetely caused me problems lol.</p>
<p>Because the passage said “sometime around 180o” or something like that.</p>
<p>It was not a definite date.</p>
<p>yeah. It was 43. If you just plugged in the numbers and found which result when divided by 0.25 was an integer. It was like $32.20-(43x.65).</p>
<p>It was the smallest number I think. I know I got it right though.</p>
<p>should i start up a coauthored / larson’s first book discussion? i put larson’s first book because it referred to HER, which is feminine singular. if it said “their” it would have indicated that the book was coauthored</p>
<p>“Was 690 (Letter E) an answer to a math problem?”</p>
<p>yes, it was E… i think the price was 6.10 or 6.90 dollars or something like that.. but it was the last one i believe</p>
<p>the stamp one was $6.90</p>
<p>Yeah it was 690. If you set 1175= (51.85+x)20 and solved for x, it equaled 6.90.</p>
<p>Did anyone else think the passage about Neanderthals was incredibly easy? Almost every question was directly referenced in the passage.</p>
<p>“Did anyone else think the passage about Neanderthals was incredibly easy? Almost every question was directly referenced in the passage.”
~cgman15</p>
<p>yes, i thought that one was amazing… and i swear i’ve seen a passage very similar to that one too.</p>
<p>dude for the circle problem i did pthy thereom twice.</p>
<p>12 squared = 2squ + 140 squared</p>
<p>9 squared= 2 squared + 77 squared</p>
<p>square root of 77 + square root of 140= 20.6= rounded to 21.</p>
<p>What’s wrong with that?</p>
<p>yes she called five minutes and i hadn’t started that one and i just hunted for the answers and found them all i love neanderthals =]</p>
<p>The first passage of the reading reminded me of an SAT passage followed by similar SAT style questions</p>
<p>jman - you can’t do pythag theorem cuz its not right triangle</p>
<p>haha nice. That math problem that had a 5 12 13 triangle and said what was 12/13 and it was sine…well anyways, that problem was in the real act book word for word lol.</p>