<p>omfg shutup its .27</p>
<p>Look at my proof. It's like page 12 or 13.</p>
<p>Who was that directed at?</p>
<p>I was trying to figure that out, too.</p>
<p>sorry i thought i was the beginning of page 16. the guy on the last thing on page 15 >.>.</p>
<p>WAIT OMG SORRY (caps). I am so sorry. I read ur post wrong. You said that .27 WAS the answer. So sorry to you.</p>
<p>woo, oh yay, so (2,3) was an answer?</p>
<p>if the thing was f(x-2) + 3 then yes i believe so</p>
<p>wasn't there a stat problem like probablity or something? how do you solve it?</p>
<p>There was std deviation.</p>
<p>stat-edit
type in the data
run 1-varstats</p>
<p>^ I love your username :)</p>
<p>To those saying the test was hard, what book did you use? I used Barron's (practically worthless only because it ha so much stuff not in the syllabus) and Rusen Meylani's 15 practice tests (which are really hard, but cover only a tiny bit more than what's actually on the test, just to make sure you're ready). I was really afraid I would flunk because my last practice test on Rusen Meylani's book gave me a 610 (the lowest score I ever got; even lower than anything in Barron's). The real test was a cakewalk for me. I remember thinking, "OMG, this is so easy! When do the hard questions come?" When I finished with almost 20 minutes to spare, I was gobsmacked (and spent a lot of my excess time on painstaking double-checking).</p>
<p>Moral of the story: Use Rusen Meylani's practice tests for prepping. It'll bring down your morale, but 95% of it is relevant to the test, and you <em>will</em> be very happy once you're done with the test itself, simply because the real thing has all the easy questions from Rusen Meylani's books, and only one or two of the hard ones.</p>
<p>i used barrons, which definitely did prepare me in all ways for the exam. the only way you can get thrown off when you take the real SAT2 is careless mistakes like not reading the question carefully.</p>
<p>^ Yeah, definitely. I know I did that on a few problems, but I was fortunate enough that the answer I got was not one of the choices, which made me look over the problem again.</p>
<p>I love how they never try to trick you with the degress/redians thing...</p>
<p>Unlike Barron's. When I was doing those tests, I felt like every other problem required me to switch from degree to radian mode or vice versa, haha.</p>
<p>Was the parametric the y-intercept or the x-intercept?</p>
<p>y-intercept</p>
<p>-1/3</p>
<p>Earlier in this thread someone said that ln(x) = e^-x question's answer was E. </p>
<p>E was 2.72 (aka e)</p>
<p>I believe that it was B 0.28.</p>
<p>i think i got about 6 wrong, hopefully not more, but i was aiming for an 800 and i think i could get one next year, im only a sophomore. i dont know if this is a stupid question but is it worth it to cancel my scores? i dont know if i even have enough time now, but i hope i dont regret taking it sophomore year.</p>