<p>So, I was not happy with my March SAT Essay score and thought I had done better than I was graded, but whatever--that can't be changed now so there's no point in being annoyed about it</p>
<p>Instead, I'd appreciate it if you guys could read my essay and tell me what you think would be an appropriate grade for it (I'm not providing the grade I was giving because it might affect your grade, but it's posted in other threads and I'll probably post it after a few replies) and give me some tips on how do better next time.
I couldn't figure out how to get the pictures as a link that would work for other people or whatev so I just typed it up. </p>
<p>ESSAY PROMPT
Think carefully about the issue presented in the following excerpt and the assignment:</p>
<p>"Organizations or groups that share a common goal often mention teamwork as their secret to success by insisting that people in the group work together for the good of the entire group. However, by requiring each individual to accept the decisions of the others in the group, organizations may discourage the expression of individual talent. Ultimately, a group is most successful when all of its members are encouraged to pursue their own goals and interests." </p>
<p>ASSIGNMENT:Are organizations or groups most successful when their members pursue individual wishes and goals? Plan and write an essay in which you develop your point of view on this issue. Support your position with reasoning and examples taken from your reading, studies, experience, or observations. </p>
<p>ESSAY:</p>
<p>It is frequently argued that requiring individuals to accept the decisions of the group may depreciate the value of expressing individual talent. Proponents of this theory believe that organizations are most successful in their endeavors if all members are given the opportunity to pursue their own interests. While this notion is enticing, it is not applicable to practical situations. Literary and historical circumstances highlight the fact that people must work together for the good of the entire group.</p>
<p>In the novel Lord of the Flies, a group of boys are left to fend for themselves on a desolate island. Jack and Ralph emerge as the leaders of the group. However, these individuals have clearly divergent personalities. Jack rules authoritatively while Ralph prefers a democratic outlook. Because of a lack of high authority, each individual is permitted to pursue his own beliefs. Consequently, the group splits up into two opposing factions, and chaos soon erupts. By illustrated the negative consequences of allowing Ralph and Jack to follow their own goals and interests, Golding thus substantiates the claim that members of a group must work together to achieve success. </p>
<p>This idea is also visible in history. Specifically, the internment of the Japanese during World War II illustrates how permitting individual factions to pursue their own interests has detrimental consequences. Instead of attempting to unite the country during a period of crisis, the Japanese were isolated from the rest of the country and discriminated against. This was a consequence of separate, smaller group within a larger one becoming opposed to each other—because one group was more powerful than the other, they could exert their power forcefully without having to compromise. The result was internment, which negatively impacted our country and created tension within our own borders. It is therefore apparent that all parts of a group must work together to be successful. </p>
<p>Both the circumstances of Lord of the Flies and Japanese internment bolster the argument that individuals must work together to succeed as a group. If individuals pursue dissimilar interests, they will not succeed in achieving their goals. </p>
<p>MY TAKE: I don't think it was exactly a great essay or something and I know its short but I'm a slow writer and idk what more I could do in 25 minutes. My grade just took me by suprise cause I had been graded better on previous practice essays with about the same quality work. The only problem I see is the second example. I realized right as I started writing it that it didn't really make sense, but there was not enough time to change it, so I just went with it and tried to twist it to make it work with my thesis. For note, there were two minor spelling errors that got corrected by autospellcheck when I typed it up (like forgetting to add an extra "s" in the middle of a word or something).</p>
<p>Thanks to everyone in advance!</p>