November 2009 SAT Math (US only)

<p>Haha shapiro. At least it gets the job done ;)</p>

<p>So since a poster up there didn’t have the prime number question, section 3 was experimental?</p>

<p>Woot!</p>

<p>I try my best. :)</p>

<p>Did anyone have the question about Ali trading coins with someone and the changing ratio that occurred?</p>

<p>Please say no. I’m hoping this section is experimental.</p>

<p>Nope, I didn’t have that question.</p>

<p>^ I had the coin one…</p>

<p>Edit: Huh, guess it was experimental. Sweet</p>

<p>No II is not true, </p>

<p>if xy=x </p>

<p>and Y = 1 </p>

<p>x can be anything, i.e X can be 10 and 10*1 = 10 </p>

<p>I is definitely true, I feel like I put either I and II or II and III but I can’t remember, are you sure that was the order?</p>

<p>I omitted it too.
But if most people didn’t have it, doesn’t that mean it’s the experimental one?</p>

<p>g1111, I believe it was
I
II
I & II
II & III
I, II, III</p>

<p>There were two entirely different versions of the test administered today.</p>

<p>Well in that case the previous poster of that question has definitely got the order wrong if he is sure that III was corrent as II is definitely not correct if II is in fact the answer choice he listed. Got I hate those questions I really feel like I screwed both that one and the stupid cz+ax = cb bull crap.</p>

<p>Can someone describe to me this question? The only one I remember having I, II, & III was about the equation ab - c =0. I got II only for taht one if somebody can clarify.</p>

<p>g1111: I remember I put I and II were true, III can’t be true because x does not have to equal y. I’m sure that III was x=y.</p>

<p>I want to agree with you toasti, I think I may have put down I and II…here’s hoping. If I didn’t and I got both of those wrong what’s a math score of -2 and an ommit? like a 690?</p>

<p>@jshapiro
There are many versions to the grid in, but there can only be one for the entire test, so the other must be experimental. There are people who only had one grid and they got the prime number (995) question and had CR experimental.
So by logic Section 3 was real and 7 was experimental. im 100% positive</p>

<p>Yes, I had one grid-in with the prime number question and a writing experimental.</p>

<p>@crazygamer, thats what i got too…</p>

<p>if i missed only 2, can i still get a 700 or 750+?</p>

<p>Now I’m confused. I had a math experimental and only one grid-in section. The grid-in section did not contain the prime number question.</p>

<p>2200…missing 2 is generally a 750 or 760.</p>

<p>kk, ty… wait how many can i miss and still stay at a 700 or above</p>