<p>Yah but m and n can’t both be 0 at the same time? I thought they would have to be different</p>
<p>They may have said distinct pairs (not necessarily different numbers within the pair) but 5 was definitely the answer for the -4 to 4 question</p>
<p>Ok there was a tree problem where you were given the height and you have to find the age what was it</p>
<p>I got 24.8 years.</p>
<p>Pyro: I believe it was around 20.</p>
<p>Yes 24.8 is correct. I forgot the equation. They just wanted make sure you knew how to deal with e.</p>
<p>I skipped 6 for sure and for safety another 6 “wrong”. What would the score be</p>
<p>About 700 i think</p>
<p>err higher than 700, maybe 720?</p>
<p>I agree with 24.8.</p>
<p>What did everyone think of it overall? That may help determine the curve. Did anyone take the June or October test?
Also compared to the released tests or any review books you used, how was this?</p>
<p>Relatively easy compared to Barron’s IMO.</p>
<p>I thought it was loads easier than the 2nd test in the BB, and about the same as the 1st test (even a little bit easier). Test one in the BB was 44 RS 800. and 2nd test was 43 RS 800. I think this time it’ll definitely be 44 or maybe even 45.</p>
<p>Much easier than barrons. if you get above a 41 raw score in barrons, you should get perfect on the real thing, barring any mistakes.</p>
<p>I thought this test and barron’s were relatively close but thats my opinion</p>
<p>It will never hit 45. </p>
<p>Does anyone remember the function that started with .4x^4 …
It asked for how many distinct roots it had.</p>
<p>What was the point that intersects the perpendicular of (0,5) and (3,0)? was it 0, (5/8)… Like you do point slope form or something</p>
<p>there were 2. according to my graphing calculator</p>
<p>gdublet i believe it was (-8/3, 0)</p>
<p>^ I got that as well</p>