October 2009 SAT Math

<p>Downhill one was either A or B. Im pretty sure it was A for 4/7. Now, go read my question and answer it please. :D</p>

<p>What is the answer just after “666”??
(I remember it’s the last question of that section)</p>

<p>i thought the parabola one was letter E, not letter A.</p>

<p>You guys, zero is divisible by 3. I think 667 is right…</p>

<p>0 through 999 < 1000
0 through 999 = 1000 numbers
1000-333= 667</p>

<p>EFFFFFFINNGGGGGG
i calculated volume, not surface area. AAAAAAAAAAAAAARRGHHHHHHHHHHHHH</p>

<p>You never count 0. If you counted 0, you might as well count all of the negatives.</p>

<p>it’s 666. 0 IS NOT A POSITIVE INTEGER. read the question carefully. (just like i should have done on the surface area problem TTTTTT.TTTTTTTTTT)</p>

<p>ALSO why did collegeboard put such a horrid number into their test??? What will religious people think??</p>

<p>oh, and another question,
If the written answer doesn’t agree with the bubbling, what’s going to happen? :c
I was so glad that I got the 666 answer right…but I’m not sure if I bubbled it in right. :ccc</p>

<p>Does anyone know the question after “666”??</p>

<p>i forget. what is this question you speak of</p>

<p>the three circles one?</p>

<p>why is the answer to the two right triangles one 3rad2?</p>

<p>what was the question to the translation (-4, -3) ?</p>

<p>Since the 2 triangles are similar. AB/x = BC/AD (AD is the bottom line)</p>

<p>no…I think…</p>

<p>okay, didn’t the triangles one have three sides with side length 1?</p>

<p>so the triangle with legs 1, 1 has hypotenuse rad 2.</p>

<p>then the triangle with legs rad 2 and 1 has hypotenuse of rad 3.</p>

<p>o___o ?!?!</p>

<p>lol, and what was the question for the line translation with answer (-4, -3)?</p>

<p>^there are 100 candies in the bag. therefore, if you had 0 wrapped chocolates, you’d have 90 candies? gg</p>

<p>the line translation with (-4,-3) had the answer y = x + 1. it was with a given diagram, asking you to take the line y = x + 4 and shift it three units vertically downwards.</p>

<p>alright, coolio :P</p>

<p>■■■
I got 800 on Math Level 2.
But I know I’m not getting 800 on this darn SAT I math.
■■■</p>

<p>the chocolate prob is 0 because 80 is unwrapped and 70 are chocolate, so technically none of the chocolate have to be wrapped</p>

<p>Do we have a consensus on the hypotenuse q.? Is it definitely rad3?</p>

<p>hey i took the SAT yesterday and i wanna know if any one remembers the question in the grid in about the diagonals ? if yes plz tell me the question and the answer</p>