<p>I think so! Did you have the Dino passage for CR?</p>
<p>@vanpersie We all have so much weighted on the scores we get from a stupid test. It’s not fair! I shouldn’t be so stressed out on the weekend. I have enough stress from taking 4 APs! Haha</p>
<p>it was neither for the yo-yo’s. You can’t say that the whole concept of commercial advertisement was born just from yo-yos. The yo-yos were just a part of that commercial advertisement that had already existed before. And the intense craze ending was wrong too. The question was why did yo-yos get popular in 1951 but not in 1950 or something like that. So the opposite happened. The craze for yo-yos began, not ended in 1951</p>
<p>@curiositi Yeah! I did have Dino.</p>
<p>PS. I hate the 60 second rule. :(</p>
<p>@happy2102 so the answer for that question would be becuause the yoyos were involved with a commercial advertisement right?</p>
<p>@peteee Yes! Yoyos= increased commercial advertisement</p>
<p>I cant remember the exact wording of my answer, but it was something like “the demand for yo-yo’s went up”. Not too sure, process of elimination mostly haha.</p>
<p>@crumma
i know i take 5 APs and my only non-AP is multivariable calculus
lmfaoo</p>
<p>@vanpersie I feel for you. haha</p>
<p>for the yo yo craze did you guys say that the 1950-1951 question was because of a commercial campaign or something…also what did you guys say scholars thought of homers writings prior to those two scientists groundbreaking research</p>
<p>the yoyo question was already discussed a few posts above. and i put that they thought that they were intended for writing.</p>
<p>for one of the questions on homer, was the answer "becuase the thing fit in with the flow of the story?</p>
<p>i remember i put something with rhythm in it, so yea i think that was the answer</p>
<p>I don’t remember the exact answer but I was between a and e and it was a</p>
<p>Last math grid in 1600?
51 for surface area of cube
165 minutes
How did Kanzi authors differ in approach?</p>
<p>What were the answers to the short passage about multiple discoveries…? Something about newton… Like what would challenge the phenomenon? And the number of such discoveries was included to validate a statement? (the statement that such phenomenon is common)</p>
<p>@nerdyjew
yes
yes
yes
and they differ in their approach by one showing his exact viewpoints on other’s work</p>
<p>A letter between newton and Leibniz</p>
<p>@pzowie</p>
<p>i think its x+y < 180 cuz x+y+z isnt > 270</p>
<p>for x+y+z to be bigger than 270, the angles have to have a average of over 90 degrees</p>
<p>the cube was 54 not 51. and wasn;t the kanzi difference that one analyzed others motives?</p>
<p>@Devilicious the question was asking which one was FALSE, so the answer to that question was x+y+z>270</p>