I think I missed 2 in the Zen passage. Praying I don’t miss anything else 
@BornPrep @azwu331 @kingofpotato No it’s not high enough. Definetely not for UVA. ((((((1850)))))) :[ Goal: 2200
Got 2 wrong on CR, 1 on WR for sure
So far that’s it
Pray
I’m thinking:
M (740): Unsure about 5/3 vs 3/5 and -1 because I didn’t do an integer for .288 which was stupid
CR (780): Unsure about the rationale vs origin question
W (690): I just always end up doing poorly on writing, yet I get a 5 on the AP Composition test. Figures
It’s 5/3, 100% sure. @BornPrep
For those of you that say the answer to the sinuous question was “no error”, please explain your rationale. As much as I want it to be no error, the definitions do appear to be the same, so why wouldn’t it be redundancy?
@kingofpotato Yep.
@ambitionsquared One of the definitions of sinuous is “characterized by a series of graceful curving motions” which has enough nuance from just being curved.
@kingofpotato LOL exactly the same situation I’m in. Also -1 for W if “sinuous” curves is actually redundant :’( Hopefully no errors in math though.
@ambitionsquared It wasn’t as obvious as “sufficiently enough”, but I’m not sure.
@kingofpotato 5/3, which was just the opposite of the first slope, -5/3, right? As in you just reversed the negative to a positive?
For my experimental section I had a question that asked you to find the value of pq when 2x-y was a factor of 8x^3+pxy-qx^2y-y^2. Did any one of you guys with a math experimental have a similar question?
What is the question fundamentally but flawed. U remember other choices? :(((((
Is it possible to miss 1 in W, get a 10 on the essay, and still get 800 in W?
@BornPrep I did the integer mistake too. IT HURTS because I had time left over on that section too to check over all my answers. such a dumb and painful mistake to make
Also, they asked about repetition with “sufficiently enough” so I don’t think redundancy was what they were trying to test.
@grparker21 Unless, of course, the sinuous question was a redundancy of the sufficiently enough redundancy question…
Wait for the 0.288 question, 36 would be a possible correct answer right?
Yes @satwreckerZ2
@Ninjadu Yes.