***October 2015 SAT (US Only) Thread***

Miss out lesson @zacle1234

same as @kingofpotato and @grparker21

how many points would my writing score go up if my essay went from a 7 to lets say 10 -11? assuming i get the same for writing mc. My first writing sitting was 630.

If I omitted 5 math questions and missed 2, around what score do you thing that is for math?

Check the curve @raider659816

Just so I can deduce which one was my experimental section: did any of you guys get a passage with Ptomely in it?

@mathshredder

  1. I put analytical, don’t remember why at this very moment
  2. Can’t remember
  3. I chose dispel misconceptions. The perception was that the Zen ideology doesn’t focus on detail. It followed by saying that the classroom was all about attention to detail but yet it wasn’t directly taught. The students had to learn it through their own trials.
  4. Finicky

Yes there is one @basedchem

All the same @bornprep

I think these are the options that people dispute

  • dismissive or incredulous
  • bold reassessment or sispel misperception
  • ominous explanation or genuine confusion
    -fundamentally but flawed or sound theory
  • analytical or emphatic

@basedchem what number was that? the curtains and blinds?

I reworded and simplified the sinuous question: Soccer consists of lots of balls, which contrast with the few balls used in basketball.

Shouldn’t it be “contrasts” in this case?

Also, do you think the curve will be 11 essay with -2 MC is still an 800??? I feel like this time writing was hard.

@annoyingorange #29 on the long writing section.

For the ominous explanation one I put unlikelihood, which is letter B

@JuicyMango Def at least a 790. It was rather difficult.

for math section is it 2.5? i dont remmeber 12.5 as one of the options tho

@JuicyMango Oops misread, thought it was 12 essay. Probably 780+

@juicymango Do you remember the actual words used in that question? I’m having a tough time remembering that one for some reason

@JuicyMango YES THAT WAS MY THINKING! They aren’t comparing curves, they’re comparing designs! You need to take away the gunk in the middle for it to make sense. Glad to see someone else sees it the same way!

@zacle1234 dismissive, dispel misperception, ominous explanation, fundamentally flawed, and analytical. Anyone agree?